Should /speckit-plan invoke plan mode in cursor? #4426
Replies: 2 comments
|
In Spec Kit v1.0.3, The workflow runs the setup script and writes So the suggestion you saw appears to be the agent interpreting the word "plan", rather than a mode switch required by Spec Kit. If Cursor's Plan mode prevents it from running the setup script or writing those artifacts, use Agent mode with an explicit scope such as:
The useful completion check is whether the expected files were produced in the feature directory, not which mode label was selected. AI-assisted response; checked against the v1.0.3 sources linked above. I have not reproduced your specific Cursor session. |
|
I don't think They are two separate concepts.
Conceptually: Cursor's Plan Mode, on the other hand, controls how the Cursor agent itself behaves while processing a request. I don't see anything in the current So if Cursor says something like:
I would interpret that as Cursor inferring a relationship between two similarly named concepts, rather than a Spec Kit requirement. Using Cursor Plan Mode may still be useful because Spec Kit's actual contract is the generated artifact, not the editor mode: So I would expect both approaches to be valid: and: with the latter being an optional Cursor-specific behavior rather than something required by Spec Kit itself. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
I invoked /speckit-plan in a new agent discussion and it immediately said that it should operate in plan mode since I invoked speckit-plan. I proceeded with its suggestion and allowed the cursor mode to change to plan. Is this the expected behavior? Spec kit v 1.0.3
All reactions