Point citation metadata at the published JOSS paper (master) - #127
Merged
Conversation
Peroxide was published in JOSS on 2026-08-10 as 11(124), 10366, DOI 10.21105/joss.10366. - README: add the JOSS status badge and make the paper the primary citation in `Cite Peroxide`, with a ready-to-paste BibTeX entry. The Zenodo concept DOI stays as the way to cite one specific release. - CITATION.cff: add the JOSS DOI to `identifiers` and add a `preferred-citation` article entry so GitHub's citation widget and cffconvert consumers resolve to the paper. Validated against the Citation File Format 1.2.0 schema with cffconvert, which Zenodo also runs during release archiving.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Peroxide was published in JOSS on 2026-08-10 as 11(124), 10366, DOI 10.21105/joss.10366. Review thread: openjournals/joss-reviews#10366.
Cite Peroxidenow leads with the paper plus a ready-to-paste BibTeX entry. The Zenodo concept DOI stays as the way to cite one specific release.identifiers, plus apreferred-citationarticle entry so GitHub's "Cite this repository" widget resolves to the paper.Validated with
cffconvert --validate(schema 1.2.0):Citation metadata are valid according to schema version 1.2.0.This matters because Zenodo runs cffconvert during GitHub release archiving, and an invalid file silently fails the deposit (see the v0.42.0 / v0.43.0 incident in RELEASES.md).