chore(release): sync main back into development - #856
Merged
Conversation
beta is the release candidate, 1026 commits ahead of main. Every conflict resolved to beta's side, including its refactors: where beta had removed a file the removal stands rather than resurrecting a stale copy from main. Conflicts: 4 (0 took beta's content, 4 removed per beta's refactor).
Release: merge beta into main
…30122839 Release: merge beta into main
The 0.1.148 release bumped the version on main. Without this, development stays behind main and the next development -> main promotion conflicts on the version file. Version files resolve to development's side, which is the higher line, so this never moves a version backwards.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Opened by the release workflow after publishing 0.1.148 from
main.A release commits a version bump onto the branch it ran from. Without carrying
that back,
developmentfalls behindmain, and since both branches thenchanged the version file independently, the next
development -> mainpromotion conflicts on it — every time.
Version files are resolved to development's side, the higher line, so this
cannot move a version backwards. Any other conflict stops the workflow instead
of being resolved automatically.
Merge this, do not squash. A squash copies the files and discards the
relationship: the merge base would not move and the next promotion would
conflict exactly as before. A 0-file diff here is normal and is not a no-op —
recording the ancestry is the whole point.