docs: add product-technical gap baseline with current PR heads

[seonghobae]

Why

Maintains a bounded, point-in-time commercial/product gap baseline without turning a static document into merge-control truth.

Current ownership-truth repair

Fresh active-owner reads on 2026-08-28 made predecessor 817c44ea14076eedbab1b882797e40ec40bfecff stale: dependency-first PR #134 now explicitly owns the workflow-specific Job grade design-review interaction under #53 → #130, but the baseline still listed Job-grade interaction as unowned. That stale buyer-planning truth could trigger a competing same-scope UI writer.

Current exact head c171601b0d702654484b99585ac0eefe02799b59 repairs that ownership statement only. The baseline now:

• records feat: add evidence-centered HR workspace slice #53 → feat(ui): add accessible protected-read request states #130 with workflow-specific children feat(ui): add one-time HR export delivery confirmation states #131 (one-time export delivery), feat(ui): add governed HR document retrieval states #132 (purpose-bound HR document retrieval), and feat(ui): add governed Job grade review states #134 (Job grade design review);
• records feat(ui): add governed Job grade review states #134 exact head 83a6bdf6af86cf4a79ddbcd7e35b24f74da9322d and focused HR Workspace Job Grade Review State Quality run 33091544470 / job 98585381713 as terminal GREEN under exact 100% line/branch/function coverage, explicitly stack-local only;
• removes Job-grade from the still-unowned workflow-specific UI list, leaving Position lifecycle/reporting, qualification-rule, absence, workforce-capacity and performance-goal interaction gaps; and
• prohibits a duplicate Job-grade review-state writer while keeping feat(job architecture): add governed job-grade design review #101 as the separate governance owner for Job Grade Design Review evidence.

This is a live-state documentation defect, so the repository baseline itself defines the operational regression: refetch the active PR graph and reject stale owner-lane copy before acting rather than hard-coding volatile GitHub state into an executable test.

Fresh live base remains develop@9e3e4847510e1e612b48474ba42b177b8ed824df.

Exact-current-head evidence

All predecessor results were discarded after the documentation head changed. Fresh exact-head workflows on c171601b0d702654484b99585ac0eefe02799b59 are now terminal GREEN:

• SAST Semgrep 33096602061 — success
• Foundation CI 33096602074 — success
• Recovery Rehearsal Quality 33096602100 — success
• Security Scan 33096602193 — success

Fresh submitted reviews are COMMENTED only; every inline review thread is resolved/outdated and there is no qualifying independent non-author APPROVE or CHANGES_REQUESTED on this PR.

GitHub reports this PR open · Draft · mergeable. The live Draft state is authoritative and this loop does not race the separate lifecycle writer. Exact-head GREEN is technical evidence, not merge authorization.

Merge-governance truth

Effective organization ruleset 18156473 is active on ~DEFAULT_BRANCH. Fresh live settings require one approving review, dismiss stale reviews on push, do not require last-push approval, require review-thread resolution and the central workflow set, prohibit deletion/non-fast-forward, and expose routine OrganizationAdmin always bypass. Issue #89 owns the stricter commercial-control gap.

Orgmetra acquisition-grade acceptance remains at least two qualifying independent non-author approvals, approval after the last push, every applicable exact-current-head local/central gate terminal GREEN, resolved conversations, and no routine administrator bypass.

Do not transfer predecessor evidence, self-approve, race another lifecycle writer, weaken/simulate protection, create a duplicate shared protected-read/document-retrieval/export/Job-grade interaction writer, create a parallel release writer, use routine administrator bypass, or use this document as control-plane truth.

[coderabbitai]

Note

Reviews paused

It looks like this branch is under active development. To avoid overwhelming you with review comments due to an influx of new commits, CodeRabbit has automatically paused this review. You can configure this behavior by changing the reviews.auto_review.auto_pause_after_reviewed_commits setting.

Use the following commands to manage reviews:

• @coderabbitai resume to resume automatic reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a single review.

Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:

• ▶️ Resume reviews
• 🔍 Trigger review

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 6266320a-d62c-4576-9ff6-4ac7ecbbcc6a

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c3289c8 and 4a07d0d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

제품·기술 격차 기준 문서를 2026-08-26 기준으로 갱신했다. 조직 ruleset, control anchor, 활성 capability, 구매자 격차, 실행 검증 조건과 운영 진단을 최신 상태로 변경했다.

Changes

제품·기술 격차 기준

Layer / File(s)	Summary
저장소 보호 및 실행 기준 docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md	조직 ruleset 18156473과 PR #119 control anchor를 기록했다. Issue #89의 상업 통제 격차를 3건으로 확장했다. 실행 루프가 유효 ruleset과 현재 PR 그래프를 재조회하도록 갱신했다.
기능 상태 및 주요 격차 docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md	PR #116–#119의 활성 capability를 추가했다. 목적 바운드 HR 반출, 권위적 성과목표, 접근성, 권위적 릴리스 운영을 최고 가치 구매자 격차로 정의했다.
운영 진단 및 참고문헌 docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md	리뷰 트리아지와 제공자 복구 진행을 2026-08-25/26 기준 네 가지 항목으로 재작성했다. References (APA 7th) 제목과 목록은 유지했다.

Estimated code review effort: 2 (간단) | ~10분

Merge Risk: 🟡 Moderate · up to 4a07d

The baseline still contains an inaccurate section heading, a conflicting open-PR count, and unclear workflow rerun instructions. These can mislead readers about repository status and recovery steps, so the PR needs follow-up before merge.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	PR 제목은 제품·기술 격차 기준 문서 추가와 현재 PR 상태 기록이라는 주요 변경 사항을 정확히 요약합니다.

Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch docs/product-technical-gap-baseline

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[devin-ai-integration]

✅ Devin Review: No Issues Found

Devin Review analyzed this PR and found no bugs or issues to report.

[seonghobae]

@opencode-agent Please review the current unchanged head against protected develop. Local exact-head verification: all owned package suites pass at 100% statement/branch coverage.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, you can upgrade your account or add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, you can upgrade your account or add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.