Skip to content

feat: add PostgreSQL operational evidence baseline - #16

Open
seonghobae wants to merge 1 commit into
feat/audit-exportfrom
feat/operational-evidence
Open

feat: add PostgreSQL operational evidence baseline#16
seonghobae wants to merge 1 commit into
feat/audit-exportfrom
feat/operational-evidence

Conversation

@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • add exact-migration catalog assertions for 16 tenant policies, enabled RLS, forced RLS, and the tenant/time audit export index
  • add ADR-0002 and a PostgreSQL operational readiness runbook
  • document the current evidence boundary without claiming retention purge, partitioning, backup/restore, rollback drills, or CSAP/SOC 2/NIST certification
  • keep the append-only audit history explicit: future retention requires a governed archive/forward migration
  • add the operational docs to the repository bootstrap validation contract

Evidence

  • fresh PostgreSQL 18.4 migration check: REAL_OPERATIONAL_CATALOG passed policies=16 rls_enabled=16 forced_rls=16 audit_index=1
  • cargo test --workspace --all-targets --locked
  • cargo clippy --workspace --all-targets --locked -- -D warnings
  • RUSTDOCFLAGS=-Dwarnings cargo doc --workspace --no-deps --locked
  • cargo build --bin lms_api --locked
  • cargo +1.97.1 fmt --all -- --check
  • cargo +1.97.1 clippy --workspace --all-targets --locked -- -D warnings
  • actionlint
  • git diff --check

Gate

This is stacked on PR #15 and remains unmerged product evidence until an independent current-head review and required Checks pass. Merge only after re-fetching exact head bb6ec38 and confirming protected rules.

@seonghobae seonghobae left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Current-head review request for bb6ec38. Please independently verify the catalog assertions, bootstrap doc paths, and that the ADR/runbook distinguishes observed evidence from unimplemented retention/rollback/partitioning claims. COMMENT only; no approval or protected-merge bypass is requested.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 8fa15e95-01e4-409c-b49e-549479244527

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant