Skip to content

feat(trace-utils): add v1-native agentless JSON encoder brick - #2370

Merged
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 11 commits into
mainfrom
anais/v1-agentless-encoder-brick
Sep 7, 2026
Merged

feat(trace-utils): add v1-native agentless JSON encoder brick#2370
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 11 commits into
mainfrom
anais/v1-agentless-encoder-brick

Conversation

@anais-raison

@anais-raison anais-raison commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Adds a v1-native equivalent of the existing v0.4 agentless JSON encoder, as groundwork for making v1::Span/v1::TraceChunk the exporter's canonical internal type:

  • agentless_encoder::encode_payload_from_v1 and its helpers (collect_attrs_v1, flatten_attr_into_v1, encode_span_link_v1, encode_span_event_v1) (libdd-trace-utils)

Nothing is wired into the live pipeline yet.

Motivation

Part of APMSP-2812: migration of the exporter from v0.4 to v1 with isolated bricks first before one final breaking PR that will handle the actual swap.

Additional Notes

Pure addition, no behavior change — these functions aren't called anywhere yet, so there's no regression risk.

Isolated brick for APMSP-2812: adds encode_payload_from_v1 and its
v1::Span-native helpers (collect_attrs_v1, flatten_attr_into_v1,
encode_span_link_v1, encode_span_event_v1) alongside the existing v0.4
agentless encoder. Not wired into any live send path yet.
@anais-raison anais-raison self-assigned this Aug 19, 2026
@datadog-datadog-us1-prod

datadog-datadog-us1-prod Bot commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tests

All CI checks and tests passed.

🎉 All green!

🧪 All tests passed
❄️ No new flaky tests detected

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
Patch Coverage: 97.02%
Overall Coverage: 77.25% (+0.17%)

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 85d57f5 | Docs | View more details | Give us feedback!

@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Comparison

Benchmark execution time: 2026-09-07 12:10:14

Comparing candidate commit db618ba in PR branch anais/v1-agentless-encoder-brick with baseline commit 64ad2ed in branch main.

📊 Benchmarking dashboard

Found 0 performance improvements and 5 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 70 metrics, 10 unstable metrics.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:glob_matcher/ascii_case_insensitive_match/wall_time

  • 🟥 execution_time [+1.919ns; +1.950ns] or [+7.192%; +7.306%]

scenario:glob_matcher/ascii_exact_match/wall_time

  • 🟥 execution_time [+1.590ns; +1.618ns] or [+5.882%; +5.986%]

scenario:glob_matcher/ascii_exact_miss/wall_time

  • 🟥 execution_time [+1.467ns; +1.501ns] or [+12.391%; +12.683%]

scenario:trace_buffer/2_senders/no_delay

  • 🟥 execution_time [+154.622µs; +170.164µs] or [+9.469%; +10.421%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-104569.928op/s; -95003.354op/s] or [-9.481%; -8.613%]

Unstable benchmarks

These benchmarks have a confidence interval too wide to call a change; treat them as noise rather than signal.

scenario:datadog_sample_span/parent_not_sampled_short_circuit/allocated_bytes

  • unstable execution_time [-0.000ns; +0.000ns] or [+514.848%; -514.855%]

scenario:datadog_sample_span/parent_sampled_short_circuit/allocated_bytes

  • unstable execution_time [-0.000ns; +0.000ns] or [+514.821%; -514.844%]

scenario:glob_matcher/ascii_case_insensitive_match/allocated_bytes

  • unstable execution_time [-0.000ns; +0.000ns] or [+536.188%; -524.377%]

scenario:glob_matcher/ascii_exact_match/allocated_bytes

  • unstable execution_time [-0.000ns; +0.000ns] or [+531.328%; -522.188%]

scenario:glob_matcher/ascii_exact_miss/allocated_bytes

  • unstable execution_time [-0.000ns; +0.000ns] or [+566.064%; -538.072%]

scenario:glob_matcher/ascii_wildcard_backtrack_match/allocated_bytes

  • unstable execution_time [-0.000ns; +0.000ns] or [+513.853%; -514.417%]

scenario:glob_matcher/ascii_wildcard_heavy_backtrack/allocated_bytes

  • unstable execution_time [-0.000ns; +0.000ns] or [+514.508%; -514.706%]

scenario:glob_matcher/ascii_wildcard_question_match/allocated_bytes

  • unstable execution_time [-0.000ns; +0.000ns] or [+513.695%; -514.348%]

scenario:glob_matcher/ascii_wildcard_star_match/allocated_bytes

  • unstable execution_time [-0.000ns; +0.000ns] or [+513.220%; -514.139%]

scenario:glob_matcher/star_short_circuit/allocated_bytes

  • unstable execution_time [-0.000ns; +0.000ns] or [+514.903%; -514.880%]

Candidate

Omitted due to size.

Baseline

Omitted due to size.

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Artifact Size Benchmark Report

aarch64-alpine-linux-musl
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/aarch64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so 8.45 MB 8.45 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
/aarch64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a 91.32 MB 91.32 MB +0% (+8 B) 👌
aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so 11.38 MB 11.38 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a 102.61 MB 102.61 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
libdatadog-x64-windows
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll 27.32 MB 27.32 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 96.08 KB 96.08 KB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb 185.41 MB 185.40 MB -0% (-8.00 KB) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 803.94 MB 804.08 MB +.01% (+141.70 KB) 🔍
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll 9.00 MB 9.00 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 96.08 KB 96.08 KB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb 26.20 MB 26.20 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 52.21 MB 52.21 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
libdatadog-x86-windows
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll 23.82 MB 23.82 MB +0% (+512 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 97.58 KB 97.58 KB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb 190.44 MB 190.44 MB +0% (+8.00 KB) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 786.99 MB 787.03 MB +0% (+42.13 KB) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll 6.96 MB 6.96 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 97.58 KB 97.58 KB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb 28.18 MB 28.18 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 49.70 MB 49.70 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
x86_64-alpine-linux-musl
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/x86_64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a 81.48 MB 81.48 MB +0% (+8 B) 👌
/x86_64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so 9.41 MB 9.41 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a 97.21 MB 97.21 MB +0% (+8 B) 👌
/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so 11.46 MB 11.46 MB 0% (0 B) 👌

Comment thread libdd-trace-utils/src/agentless_encoder/mod.rs Outdated
Comment thread libdd-trace-utils/src/agentless_encoder/mod.rs
Comment thread libdd-trace-utils/src/agentless_encoder/mod.rs Outdated
Comment thread libdd-trace-utils/src/agentless_encoder/mod.rs Outdated
Comment thread libdd-trace-utils/src/agentless_encoder/mod.rs Outdated
Comment thread libdd-trace-utils/src/agentless_encoder/mod.rs
@anais-raison
anais-raison marked this pull request as ready for review August 28, 2026 13:19
@anais-raison
anais-raison requested review from a team as code owners August 28, 2026 13:19

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 1fbc4b65b4

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread libdd-trace-utils/src/agentless_encoder/mod.rs Outdated
Comment thread libdd-trace-utils/src/agentless_encoder/mod.rs
Comment thread libdd-trace-utils/src/agentless_encoder/mod.rs Outdated
Comment thread libdd-trace-utils/src/agentless_encoder/mod.rs Outdated
Comment thread libdd-trace-utils/src/agentless_encoder/mod.rs Outdated
Comment thread libdd-trace-utils/src/agentless_encoder/mod.rs
Comment thread libdd-trace-utils/src/agentless_encoder/mod.rs Outdated
Comment thread libdd-trace-utils/src/agentless_encoder/mod.rs
Comment thread libdd-trace-utils/src/agentless_encoder/mod.rs
Comment thread libdd-trace-utils/src/agentless_encoder/mod.rs
Comment thread libdd-trace-utils/src/agentless_encoder/mod.rs
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants