ENG-2238 Create a Discourse Graphs skill for security advisory assessment

[mdroidian]

Reviewer brief

Review focus: the boundary between evidence of unused code and explicit acceptance of residual risk. Historical decisions are fixtures, not authorization for future dismissals.

ENG-2238 defines the scope. The skill is repository-owned and uses supporting references to keep its entry point concise.

Verification

• Skill metadata validator, relative reference links, and Prettier: passed.
• Local-only dry run: CryptoJS unused randomness, tar accepted tooling risk, and shared Obsidian parsing produced distinct recommendations. No alert mutations or comments were performed during the dry run.
• HTML template: three cards, filtering, search, empty results, reset, live counts, and mobile overflow checks passed with no browser errors.
• Frozen install and all four workspace unit-test tasks passed. Full local validation stopped at website type checking; GitHub CI validation, formatting, linting, and the Vercel preview passed.

Loom video

No recording attached.

Scope check

• Ran $scope-check against ENG-2238 and the final diff.
• Scope beyond Done When: None.

Local delegated full review

• Delegated review was not run. The full skill package was reviewed locally.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated
discourse-graph	Ready	Preview	Sep 7, 2026 6:51am UTC

[linear-code]

ENG-2238

[supabase]

This pull request has been ignored for the connected project zytfjzqyijgagqxrzbmz because there are no changes detected in packages/database/supabase directory. You can change this behaviour in Project Integrations Settings ↗︎.

---

Preview Branches by Supabase.
Learn more about Supabase Branching ↗︎.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-09-07T06:56:02.587793Z	ee9aa9a	Draft marked ready

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.