Skip to content

cat-mode: rejoin wrapped prose so the file is back under its own cap - #382

Merged
EdbertChan merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
stack/EdbertChan/reflect/ui-input-guard-hook-freshness-20260908/cat-mode-rejoin-wrapped-prose-file-back-under-own--40138c11
Sep 12, 2026
Merged

cat-mode: rejoin wrapped prose so the file is back under its own cap#382
EdbertChan merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
stack/EdbertChan/reflect/ui-input-guard-hook-freshness-20260908/cat-mode-rejoin-wrapped-prose-file-back-under-own--40138c11

Conversation

@EdbertChan

@EdbertChan EdbertChan commented Sep 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

main is red on cat-mode's own re-bloat test. The file stands at 303 lines against its 300-line cap, so every branch cut from main inherits the failure.

Three hard-wrapped paragraphs become one line each. No rule text is removed, reworded, or reordered.

The cap counts lines, and these paragraphs were wrapped rather than long, so rejoining them buys headroom without touching what the skill says.

Review Claim

cat-mode is back under its line cap with its content byte-identical apart from removed line wrapping.

Review Lane

cleanup

Review Unit

cleanup

Safety Invariant

Only newline placement inside three paragraphs changes; the diff removes 13 lines and adds 3, all of them prose continuations of the same sentences. No frontmatter, no section headings, no rule wording, and the skill's contract tests still pass.

Slice Rationale

It sits at the bottom of this stack because the failure is inherited from main, so every slice above it is red until this lands.

Non-goals

Does not delete or shorten any rule, does not raise the cap, and does not restructure the skill into references, which is the real answer the next time it fills up.

Test Plan

Test Plan
  • python3 -m unittest discover -s tests -p "test_cat_mode.py" — OK, 303 lines to 294 against the 300 cap
  • python3 scripts/check_no_dated_provenance.py --base origin/main — ok

Revert Plan

Revert Plan
  • Safe to revert? Yes
  • Revert command: git revert <sha>
  • Post-revert steps: None. Reverting restores the red test on main.
  • Data migration? No

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01KU2pPKob4MJ1NqjsfTNyYJ

main is red on cat-mode's own re-bloat test: the file stands at 303 lines
against a 300-line cap, so every branch inherits the failure.

Three hard-wrapped paragraphs become one line each. No rule text is removed
or reworded; the cap counts lines, and these were wrapped, not long.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01KU2pPKob4MJ1NqjsfTNyYJ
Change-Id: I40138c11a7a8585ea4d980e417ad257d62e443e9
@EdbertChan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

This pull request is part of a Mergify stack:

# Pull Request Link
1 cat-mode: rejoin wrapped prose so the file is back under its own cap #382 👈
2 hook(diu-stop): scope the unverified marker to its own paragraph #383
3 skill(reflect): do not apply findings from a fan-out that never returned #384
4 audit(token_audit): count naming the shortcut, and typing the fix command #385

@cursor

cursor Bot commented Sep 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Bugbot couldn't run - usage limit reached

Bugbot is counted against Cursor usage for this user or team, and this run hit a usage or spend limit.

A user or team admin can review and increase usage limits in the Cursor dashboard.

(requestId: serverGenReqId_40762657-dc36-4210-a77e-2c32c2bb35ba)

@mergify

mergify Bot commented Sep 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tick the box to add this pull request to the merge queue (same as @mergifyio queue).

  • Queue this pull request

@EdbertChan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Mergify repair stopped: required check failed: test. The retry cap was reached for current head a420fc8.

@EdbertChan
EdbertChan merged commit 9cbb916 into main Sep 12, 2026
3 of 4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant