[CAT-UNVERIFIED tag](6) show-me-your-work names the tag, and guard the whole repo - #420
Merged
EdbertChan merged 1 commit intoSep 12, 2026
Conversation
Bugbot couldn't run - usage limit reachedBugbot is counted against Cursor usage for this user or team, and this run hit a usage or spend limit. A user or team admin can review and increase usage limits in the Cursor dashboard. (requestId: serverGenReqId_8826b7f2-7d46-4e7f-bd6c-8519ea5f9d9c) |
3 tasks
Owner
Author
EdbertChan
force-pushed
the
stack/EdbertChan/cat-unverified-tag/5-docs
branch
from
September 12, 2026 06:21
788dd3d to
ef8a521
Compare
EdbertChan
changed the base branch from
stack/EdbertChan/cat-unverified-tag/5-docs
to
main
September 12, 2026 06:21
… repo show-me-your-work told the author to mark a same-model review with bare `UNVERIFIED:`. It now uses the tag with the blocker named. This is the last instructional line, so tests/test_escape_hatch_vocabulary.py can now scan every rule, skill, reference and hook README and require zero lines that still instruct the retired marker. On 509b9cd the same scan flags 30 lines. It is the guard that stops the prose drifting back. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VKsvxJk65w6q7KnPSRYvNg
EdbertChan
force-pushed
the
stack/EdbertChan/cat-unverified-tag/6-product-skill-and-repo-guard
branch
from
September 12, 2026 06:22
63974ce to
9a89783
Compare
Bugbot couldn't run - usage limit reachedBugbot is counted against Cursor usage for this user or team, and this run hit a usage or spend limit. A user or team admin can review and increase usage limits in the Cursor dashboard. (requestId: serverGenReqId_3ef7bc06-edbd-474c-a57b-bac332407433) |
Contributor
|
Tick the box to add this pull request to the merge queue (same as
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
show-me-your-work now tells the author to mark a same-model review with the tag, blocker named.
It told authors to use bare
UNVERIFIED:, which the hooks now reject.That was the last such line, so a repo-wide test now fails on any rule, skill or hook README that brings it back.
Review Claim
Approve show-me-your-work naming the tag, and a test that fails when any instructional file tells an author to write bare
UNVERIFIED:.Review Lane
behavior
Review Unit
product-skill
Safety Invariant
Prose plus a read-only repo scan test; no runtime change.
Slice Rationale
Product skills are their own review unit. The repo-wide guard lands here, last, because this is the first point where every line it scans is migrated.
Non-goals
No hook, script or install change.
Test Plan
Test Plan
python3 engine/skills/make-pr/scripts/preflight.py --base <this PR's base>bash scripts/run_all_tests.sh-- exit 0, 45 suites OK, 0 failed, 1684 teststests/test_escape_hatch_vocabulary.py-- the scan flags 30 instructing lines on509b9cdand 0 hereRevert Plan
Revert Plan
git revert <sha>🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_01VKsvxJk65w6q7KnPSRYvNg
Note
Low Risk
Documentation and read-only test coverage only; no hook, install, or runtime behavior changes.
Overview
show-me-your-work no longer tells authors to prefix the Attention line with bare
UNVERIFIED:when same-model self-review is unavoidable. It now names the full{{CAT-UNVERIFIED: the review -- cannot verify: same-model self-review}}tag so the skill matches evidence hooks that only clear on that form.A new
tests/test_escape_hatch_vocabulary.pysuite walks instructional rules/skills/READMEs viaescape_hatch_vocab, failing if any file still instructs writers to use the retired bare marker (while allowing mentions that it is retired, the tag itself, and incidental “UNVERIFIED” wording).test_show_me_your_work.pyadds a focused check that the skill text passes that detector and contains the new tag string.Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 9a89783. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.