Skip to content

checkstyle - enabling OperatorWrap rule, and refactoring findings - #1609

Open
stomaszek wants to merge 1 commit into
LibrePDF:masterfrom
stomaszek:feature/checkstyle-operator-wrap
Open

checkstyle - enabling OperatorWrap rule, and refactoring findings#1609
stomaszek wants to merge 1 commit into
LibrePDF:masterfrom
stomaszek:feature/checkstyle-operator-wrap

Conversation

@stomaszek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description of the new Feature/Bugfix

Checkstyle rule OperatorWrap enabled, and reported style valuations refactored to compliant.

Related Issue: #

Unit-Tests for the new Feature/Bugfix

none

Compatibilities Issues

none

Your real name

Sławomir Tomaszek

Testing details

Any other details about how to test the new feature or bugfix?

Just code reformat - no special testing done and needed.

@codacy-production

codacy-production Bot commented Aug 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Not up to standards ⛔

🔴 Issues 4 minor

Alerts:
⚠ 4 issues (≤ 0 issues of at least minor severity)

Results:
4 new issues

Category Results
CodeStyle 4 minor

View in Codacy

🟢 Metrics -1123 duplication

Metric Results
Duplication -1123

View in Codacy

NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.

@stomaszek
stomaszek force-pushed the feature/checkstyle-operator-wrap branch from b60603e to 90b42f6 Compare August 28, 2026 17:27
@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
D Reliability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarQube for IDE

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant