Date-stamp the citation counts and give them a script that can retake them - #175
Merged
Conversation
… them reports/us-hank-open-source.html said its counts 'use canonical OpenAlex records' and the GitHub API, but nothing recorded when they were taken and no script existed to retake them — so a reader could not tell a current number from a stale one, and two had drifted: Kaplan–Moll–Violante 1,359 against a live 1,377, and Sequence-Space Jacobian 245 against 248 (stars 351 against 353). Refreshed against the live records, stamped with the retrieval date, and reproducible with reports/fetch_hank_counts.py. Not wired into CI on purpose: a citation count is not a build-breaking fact and an external API should not be able to fail a site build. The checker refuses to skip a row it cannot locate — silently checking three of five rows would be the same defect in a new place. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
reports/us-hank-open-source.html said its counts 'use canonical OpenAlex
records' and the GitHub API, but nothing recorded when they were taken and
no script existed to retake them — so a reader could not tell a current
number from a stale one, and two had drifted: Kaplan–Moll–Violante 1,359
against a live 1,377, and Sequence-Space Jacobian 245 against 248 (stars
351 against 353). Refreshed against the live records, stamped with the
retrieval date, and reproducible with reports/fetch_hank_counts.py.
Not wired into CI on purpose: a citation count is not a build-breaking
fact and an external API should not be able to fail a site build. The
checker refuses to skip a row it cannot locate — silently checking three
of five rows would be the same defect in a new place.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) noreply@anthropic.com
🤖 Generated with Claude Code