Add advanced openpyxl chapter - #74
Conversation
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 0d4a9a0b75
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
4d9b224 to
b9bb188
Compare
|
@codex review |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Keep them coming! Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
Summary
openpyxl, in English, Brazilian Portuguese, and Spanishrequirements-external.txtwithopenpyxl>=3.1,<3.2pandasandopenpyxlcomplete within Phase 9, withrequestsandpytestplanned nextChapter shape
workbook_basics.pyload_and_iterate.pystyled_report.pytable_and_validation.pywrite_only_export.pyDependency contract
pandas>=3.0,<3.1openpyxl>=3.1,<3.2Validation
mainatfe1fae7463fe0eb7cb4ca30a42e81007f4d0b454b9bb18897537cbc969b3bea8b67b975a1881b328git diff --checkpassedRepository quality checksrun #505)Review follow-up
zipfile.BadZipFileandopenpyxl.utils.exceptions.InvalidFileExceptionexplicitly, while preservingOSErrorhandling for file I/O failures@codex reviewrequested on the corrected HEADReferences
Primary references are the current official openpyxl documentation and tutorial, optimized-mode, styles, tables, data-validation, and worksheet-editing documentation, plus the openpyxl PyPI release metadata. Version-sensitive behavior and important limitations are documented explicitly.