R3: establish primitive-boundary topology - #7
Conversation
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 106675519c
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| # Riverbraid public navigation | ||
|
|
||
| Riverbraid is an open source verification floor for making structure, authority, and drift visible before trust is granted. | ||
| > Lifecycle: ACTIVE_ARCHITECTURAL_SURFACE |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When consumers compare this public routing page with the repository's machine-readable state, the new ACTIVE_ARCHITECTURAL_SURFACE label contradicts repo.role.json, which still declares status: "parked" and active_behavior_claimed: false; verify-parked.cjs also explicitly enforces the parked status. This leaves the public and automated lifecycle classifications mutually inconsistent, so either the metadata and verifier must be updated as part of this transition or the profile must retain a parked lifecycle label.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
R3 scope
Integrate the exact read-only-reconciled R3 branch for
Riverbraid/.githubintomain.main@f1728005ff06752b71713f2cca8b1582ef82447fr3/public-routing-boundary@106675519cd2f7665a0bdc1a0d3df9041ed92ac05PASS_R3_BRANCH_SET_READY_FOR_SEPARATE_PR_REVIEWThis PR uses the exact S11-selected R3 branch
r3/public-routing-boundaryat106675519cd2f7665a0bdc1a0d3df9041ed92ac0for Set003 sequence 5.Set003 operation classes: REPLACE_PATH=1.
Boundary
Creating this PR does not merge it and does not authorize merge, ref movement, branch deletion, tagging, release creation, repository settings changes, or any other mutation. It does not claim truth, trust, evidentiary weight, legitimacy, certification, safety, production readiness, adoption, or external validation. Repository-specific authority and experimental/noncontrolling labels remain exactly scoped as already reviewed.