109 implement conjugated portdefinitionextensions - #320
Merged
antoineatstariongroup merged 3 commits intoJul 28, 2026
Merged
Conversation
…orresponding test
lxatstariongroup
requested changes
Jul 3, 2026
lxatstariongroup
left a comment
lxatstariongroup
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please implement Sonarqube's suggestions
TanaseMariusatstarion
force-pushed
the
109-implement-conjugated-portdefinitionextensions
branch
from
July 3, 2026 12:47
36760b9 to
bfc13d1
Compare
lxatstariongroup
approved these changes
Jul 3, 2026
|
antoineatstariongroup
approved these changes
Jul 28, 2026
antoineatstariongroup
deleted the
109-implement-conjugated-portdefinitionextensions
branch
July 28, 2026 09:04
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Prerequisites
Description
Fixed #109 implementation of ConjugatedPortDefinition extensions