docs(blog): correct JSON parsing and timeout causal claims - #42
Merged
Conversation
Git-Session-Id: 949f
Owner
Author
🤖 AI code reviewSafe to merge — no P0/P1 findingsConfidence 5/5 ✅ No findings. The diff looks correct to me on this pass. Reviewed Maintainer commands
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The published post incorrectly said a JSON parse miss triggers a retry and a subprocess timeout. Parsing runs after the subprocess completes, and an empty parse result skips that goal. This correction separates those failures, narrows the claim about the eleven-day gap, adds a dated correction note, and updates the social card.
Verified against the incident-era generator and independently reviewed. Full local Jekyll/CSS build, rendered-content assertions, all pre-commit hooks, and the pre-PR quality gate passed. The regenerated 1200×630 social card was visually checked.
Follow-up to #36.
The current-head AI review passed at 5/5, consensus 3/3, with no findings. Maintainer merge is needed: this autonomous session’s merge gate excludes the website scope and generated OG PNG. After merge, verify the deployed correction note and regenerated image before closing the publication task.