Patch T277832 - #90
Conversation
jsnshrmn
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for your work on this! The redaction logic looks good, but it also looks like a couple of paths got missed. Also, please separate the dependency work from the redaction work. short commit messages are the norm here, but it makes it even more important to try to keep each commit's scope tight.
The download pages now check the rows too, but they refuse a search with more than 5000 rows, because (e.g.) |
jsnshrmn
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the changes! One inline question/suggestion.
0bbe589 to
10fab2b
Compare
Bug: T277832