Skip to content

14 9 - 14 10 backport try2 - #2033

Open
reshke wants to merge 91 commits into
apache:REL_2_STABLEfrom
reshke:pg_14_9_14_10_try2
Open

reshke wants to merge 91 commits into
apache:REL_2_STABLEfrom
reshke:pg_14_9_14_10_try2

Conversation

@reshke

@reshke reshke commented Sep 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fixes #ISSUE_Number

What does this PR do?

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature with breaking changes)
  • Documentation update

Breaking Changes

Test Plan

  • Unit tests added/updated
  • Integration tests added/updated
  • Passed make installcheck
  • Passed make -C src/test installcheck-cbdb-parallel

Impact

Performance:

User-facing changes:

Dependencies:

Checklist

Additional Context

CI Skip Instructions


jeff-davis and others added 18 commits September 18, 2026 09:38
Renaming a role can affect the meaning of the special string $user, so
must cause search_path to be recalculated.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/186761d32c0255debbdf50b6310b581b9c973e6c.camel@j-davis.com
Reviewed-by: Nathan Bossart, Michael Paquier
Backpatch-through: 11
The fix itself is fine, but the test revealed other problems related
to parallel query that are not easily fixable. Remove the test for
now to fix the buildfarm.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/88825.1691665432@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 11
Attribute missing values might be needed past the lifetime of the tuple
descriptors from which they are extracted. To avoid possibly using
pointers for by-reference values which might thus be left dangling, we
cache a datumCopy'd version of the datum in the TopMemoryContext. Since
we first search for the value this only needs to be done once per
session for any such value.

Original complaint from Tom Lane, idea for mitigation by Andrew Dunstan,
tweaked by Tom Lane.

Backpatch to version 11 where missing values were introduced.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1306569.1687978174@sss.pgh.pa.us
The list of external language drivers and procedural languages was
never complete or exhaustive, and rather than attempting to manage
it the content has migrated to the wiki.  This replaces the tables
altogether with links to the wiki as we regularly get requests for
adding various projects,  which we reject without any clear policy
for why or how the content should be managed.

The threads linked to below are the most recent discussions about
this, the archives contain many more.

Backpatch to all supported branches since the list on the wiki
applies to all branches.

Author: Jonathan Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/169165415312.635.10247434927885764880@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/169177958824.635.11087800083040275266@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: v11
Revalidation of a plancache entry (after a cache invalidation event)
requires acquiring a snapshot.  Normally that is harmless, but not
if the cached statement is one that needs to run without acquiring a
snapshot.  We were already aware of that for TransactionStmts,
but for some reason hadn't extrapolated to the other statements that
PlannedStmtRequiresSnapshot() knows mustn't set a snapshot.  This can
lead to unexpected failures of commands such as SET TRANSACTION
ISOLATION LEVEL.  We can fix it in the same way, by excluding those
command types from revalidation.

However, we can do even better than that: there is no need to
revalidate for any statement type for which parse analysis, rewrite,
and plan steps do nothing interesting, which is nearly all utility
commands.  To mechanize this, invent a parser function
stmt_requires_parse_analysis() that tells whether parse analysis does
anything beyond wrapping a CMD_UTILITY Query around the raw parse
tree.  If that's what it does, then rewrite and plan will just
skip the Query, so that it is not possible for the same raw parse
tree to produce a different plan tree after cache invalidation.

stmt_requires_parse_analysis() is basically equivalent to the
existing function analyze_requires_snapshot(), except that for
obscure reasons that function omits ReturnStmt and CallStmt.
It is unclear whether those were oversights or intentional.
I have not been able to demonstrate a bug from not acquiring a
snapshot while analyzing these commands, but at best it seems mighty
fragile.  It seems safer to acquire a snapshot for parse analysis of
these commands too, which allows making stmt_requires_parse_analysis
and analyze_requires_snapshot equivalent.

In passing this fixes a second bug, which is that ResetPlanCache
would exclude ReturnStmts and CallStmts from revalidation.
That's surely *not* safe, since they contain parsable expressions.

Per bug #18059 from Pavel Kulakov.  Back-patch to all supported
branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18059-79c692f036b25346@postgresql.org
After commit b0bea38, syslogger prints 63 warnings about failing to
close a listen socket at postmaster startup. That's because the
syslogger process forks before the ListenSockets array is initialized,
so ClosePostmasterPorts() calls "close(0)" 64 times. The first call
succeeds, because fd 0 is stdin.

This has been like this since commit 9a86f03 in version 13, which
moved the SysLogger_Start() call to before initializing ListenSockets.
We just didn't notice until commit b0bea38 added the LOG message.

Reported by Michael Paquier and Jeff Janes.

Author: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ZOvvuQe0rdj2slA9%40paquier.xyz
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ZO0fgDwVw2SUJiZx@paquier.xyz#482670177eb4eaf4c9f03c1eed963e5f
Backpatch-through: 13
nFreeBlocks, defined as a long, stores the number of free blocks in a
logical tape.  ltsGetFreeBlock() has been using an int to store the
value of nFreeBlocks, which could lead to overflows on platforms where
long and int are not the same size (in short everything except Windows
where long is 4 bytes).

The problematic intermediate variable is switched to be a long instead
of an int.

Issue introduced by c02fdc9, so backpatch down to 13.

Author: Ranier vilela
Reviewed-by: Peter Geoghegan, David Rowley
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEudQApLDWCBR_xmwNjGBrDo+f+S4E87x3s7-+hoaKqYdtC4JQ@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
Commit e4106b2 should have updated this test, but did not; back-patch
to all supported branches.

Reviewed by Richard Guo.

Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAPmGK15nR0NXLSCKQAcqbZbTzrzd5MozowWnTnGfPkayndF43Q%40mail.gmail.com
This could lead to an imprecise choice when splitting an index page of a
GiST index on a tsvector, deciding which entries should remain on the
old page and which entries should move to a new page.

This is wrong since tsearch2 has been moved into core with commit
140d4eb, so backpatch all the way down.  This error has been
spotted by valgrind.

Author: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17950-6c80a8d2b94ec695@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 11
Reported-by: barsikdacat@gmail.com

Diagnosed-by: Laurenz Albe

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/168991536429.626.9957835774751337210@wrigleys.postgresql.org

Author: Laurenz Albe

Backpatch-through: 11
pgbouncer can cause PQbackendPID() to return negative values due to it
filling be_pid with random bytes (even these days pid_max can only be
set up to 2^22 on 64b machines on Linux, for example, so this cannot
happen with normal PID numbers).  When this happens, pg_basebackup may
generate a temporary slot name that may not be accepted by the parser,
leading to spurious failures, like:
pg_basebackup: error: could not send replication command
ERROR:  replication slot name "pg_basebackup_-1201966863" contains
invalid character

This commit fixes that problem by formatting the result from
PQbackendPID() as an unsigned integer when creating the temporary
replication slot name, so as the invalid character is gone and the
command can be parsed.

Author: Jelte Fennema
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson, Nishant Sharma
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGECzQQOGvYfp8ziF4fWQ_o8s2K7ppaoWBQnTmdakn3s-4Z=5g@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 11
Commit 0668719 changed XLogPageRead() so that it validated the page
header, if invalid page header was found reset the error message and
retried reading the page, to fix the scenario where streaming standby
got stuck at a continuation record. This change hid the error message
about invalid page header, which would make it harder for users to
investigate what the actual issue was found in WAL.

To fix the issue, this commit makes XLogPageRead() report the error
message when invalid page header is found.

When not in standby mode, an invalid page header should cause recovery
to end, not retry reading the page, so XLogPageRead() doesn't need to
validate the page header for the retry. Instead, ReadPageInternal() should
be responsible for the validation in that case. Therefore this commit
changes XLogPageRead() so that if not in standby mode it doesn't validate
the page header for the retry.

This commit has been originally pushed as of 6860198 for 15 and
newer versions, but not to the older branches.  A recent investigation
related to WAL replay failures has showed up that the lack of this patch
in 12~14 is an issue, as we want to be able to improve the WAL reader to
make a correct distinction between the end-of-wal and OOM cases when
validating record headers.  REL_11_STABLE is left out as it will be
EOL'd soon.

Reported-by: Yugo Nagata
Author: Yugo Nagata, Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reviewed-by: Ranier Vilela, Fujii Masao
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210718045505.32f463ed6c227111038d8ae4@sraoss.co.jp
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17928-aa92416a70ff44a2@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 12
… ERROR.

The transactions and subtransactions array that was allocated under
snapshot builder memory context and recorded during decoding was not
cleared in case of errors. This can result in an assertion failure if we
attempt to retry logical decoding within the same session. To address this
issue, we register a callback function under the snapshot builder memory
context to clear the recorded transactions and subtransactions array along
with the context.

This problem doesn't exist in PG16 and HEAD as instead of using
InitialRunningXacts, we added the list of transaction IDs and
sub-transaction IDs, that have modified catalogs and are running during
snapshot serialization, to the serialized snapshot (see commit 7f13ac8).

Author: Hou Zhijie
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 11
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/18055-ab3beed9f4b7b7d6@postgresql.org
Both 50e17ad and 29f45e2 mistakenly tried to record a plan dependency
on a function but mistakenly inverted the OidIsValid test.  This meant
that we'd record a dependency only when the function's Oid was
InvalidOid.  Clearly this was meant to *not* record the dependency in
that case.

50e17ad made this mistake first, then in v15 29f45e2 copied the same
mistake.

Reported-by: Tom Lane
Backpatch-through: 14, where 50e17ad first made this mistake
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2277537.1694301772@sss.pgh.pa.us
When a snapshot file fails to be read in ImportSnapshot(), it would
issue an ERROR as "invalid snapshot identifier" when opening a stream
for it in read-only mode.  This error message is reworded to be the same
as all the other messages used in this case on failure, which is useful
when debugging this area.

Thinko introduced by bb446b6 where snapshot imports have been
added.  A backpatch down to 11 is done as this can improve any work
related to snapshot imports in older branches.

Author: Bharath Rupireddy
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALj2ACWmr=3KdxDkm8h7Zn1XxBoF6hdzq8WQyMn2y1OL5RYFrg@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 11
This reverts commit a0d87bc, following a remark from Andres Frend
that the new error can be triggered with an incorrect SET TRANSACTION
SNAPSHOT command without being really helpful for the user as it uses
the internal file name.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230914020724.hlks7vunitvtbbz4@awork3.anarazel.de
Backpatch-through: 11
@reshke

reshke commented Sep 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

part of #1922

@reshke
reshke force-pushed the pg_14_9_14_10_try2 branch 4 times, most recently from a9a0809 to ad7a9a1 Compare September 19, 2026 12:20
tglsfdc and others added 4 commits September 19, 2026 20:54
…rtal.

cursor_to_xmlschema() assumed that any Portal must have a tupDesc,
which is not so.  Add a defensive check.

It's plausible that this mistake occurred because of the rather
poorly chosen name of the lookup function SPI_cursor_find(),
which in such cases is returning something that isn't very much
like a cursor.  Add some documentation to try to forestall future
errors of the same ilk.

Report and patch by Boyu Yang (docs changes by me).  Back-patch
to all supported branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/dd343010-c637-434c-a8cb-418f53bda3b8.yangboyu.yby@alibaba-inc.com
The text got the condition backwards, it's "NSN > LSN", not "NSN < LSN".
While we're at it, expand it a little for clarity.

Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4cb46e18-e688-524a-0f73-b1f03ed5d6ee@iki.fi
In older branches, COMMIT/ROLLBACK AND CHAIN failed to propagate
the current transaction's properties to the new transaction if
there was any open subtransaction (unreleased savepoint).
Instead, some previous transaction's properties would be restored.
This is because the "if (s->chain)" check in CommitTransactionCommand
examined the wrong instance of the "chain" flag and falsely
concluded that it didn't need to save transaction properties.

Our regression tests would have noticed this, except they used
identical transaction properties for multiple tests in a row,
so that the faulty behavior was not distinguishable from correct
behavior.

Commit 12d768e fixed the problem in v15 and later, but only rather
accidentally, because I removed the "if (s->chain)" test to avoid a
compiler warning, while not realizing that the warning was flagging a
real bug.

In v14 and before, remove the if-test and save transaction properties
unconditionally; just as in the newer branches, that's not expensive
enough to justify thinking harder.

Add the comment and extra regression test to v15 and later to
forestall any future recurrence, but there's no live bug in those
branches.

Patch by me, per bug #18118 from Liu Xiang.  Back-patch to v12 where
the AND CHAIN feature was added.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18118-4b72fcbb903aace6@postgresql.org
The previous wording had a faint archaic whiff to it, and more
importantly used "catalogs" as a verb, which while cutely
self-referential seems likely to provoke confusion in this
particular context.  Also consistently use "kind" not "type" to
refer to the different kinds of relations distinguished by relkind.

Per gripe from Martin Nash.  Back-patch to supported versions.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/169518739902.3727338.4793815593763320945@wrigleys.postgresql.org
alvherre and others added 2 commits September 19, 2026 22:38
Commit cda6a8d removed a few datatypes, but didn't update
pg_upgrade --check to throw error if these types are used.  So the users
find that pg_upgrade --check tells them that everything is fine, only to
fail when the real upgrade is attempted.

Reviewed-by: Tristan Partin <tristan@neon.tech>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kharage <suraj.kharage@enterprisedb.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202309201654.ng4ksea25mti@alvherre.pgsql
The initial estimate of the number of distinct ParsedWords is just
that: an estimate.  Don't let it exceed what palloc is willing to
allocate.  If in fact we need more entries, we'll eventually fail
trying to enlarge the array.  But if we don't, this allows success on
inputs that currently draw "invalid memory alloc request size".

Per bug #18080 from Uwe Binder.  Back-patch to all supported branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18080-d5c5e58fef8c99b7@postgresql.org
nathan-bossart and others added 29 commits September 19, 2026 22:39
The SIGTERM handler for the startup process immediately calls
proc_exit() for the duration of the restore_command, i.e., a call
to system().  This system() call forks a new process to execute the
shell command, and this child process inherits the parent's signal
handlers.  If both the parent and child processes receive SIGTERM,
both will attempt to call proc_exit().  This can end badly.  For
example, both processes will try to remove themselves from the
PGPROC shared array.

To fix this problem, this commit adds a check in
StartupProcShutdownHandler() to see whether MyProcPid == getpid().
If they match, this is the parent process, and we can proc_exit()
like before.  If they do not match, this is a child process, and we
just emit a message to STDERR (in a signal safe manner) and
_exit(), thereby skipping any problematic exit callbacks.

This commit also adds checks in proc_exit(), ProcKill(), and
AuxiliaryProcKill() that verify they are not being called within
such child processes.

Suggested-by: Andres Freund
Reviewed-by: Thomas Munro, Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Y9nGDSgIm83FHcad%40paquier.xyz
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230223231503.GA743455%40nathanxps13
Backpatch-through: 11
Per code coverage reports, we had zero regression test coverage
of these functions.  That came back to bite us, as apparently
that's allowed us to miss discovering misbehavior of this code
with AIX's xlc compiler.  Install relevant portions of the
test cases added in 97957fd, 2f04720, 19fa977.

(Assuming the expected outcome that the xlc problem does appear
in back branches, a code fix will follow.)

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+hUKGK=DOC+hE-62FKfZy=Ybt5uLkrg3zCZD-jFykM-iPn8yw@mail.gmail.com
This commit (c290e79) was originally back-patched to v15.
Commit 97550c0 added a new use of STDERR_FILENO, and it was
back-patched all the way to v11, thus breaking MSVC builds for v11
through v14.  Since STDERR_FILENO is now needed on older versions,
let's back-patch c290e79 down to v11, too.

Here follows the original commit message describing the change:

Because they are not available we've used _fileno(stdin) in some places, but
that doesn't reliably work, because stdin might be closed. This is the
prerequisite of the subsequent commit, fixing a failure introduced in
76e38b3.

Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reported-By: Sandeep Thakkar <sandeep.thakkar@enterprisedb.com>
Message-Id: 20220520164558.ozb7lm6unakqzezi@alap3.anarazel.de (on pgsql-packagers)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20231017164517.GA613565%40nathanxps13
Backpatch-through: 11
Remove use of LLVMGetElementType() and provide the type of all pointers
to LLVMBuildXXX() functions when emitting IR, as required by modern LLVM
versions[1].

 * For LLVM <= 14, we'll still use the old LLVMBuildXXX() functions.
 * For LLVM == 15, we'll continue to do the same, explicitly opting
   out of opaque pointer mode.
 * For LLVM >= 16, we'll use the new LLVMBuildXXX2() functions that take
   the extra type argument.

The difference is hidden behind some new IR emitting wrapper functions
l_load(), l_gep(), l_call() etc.  The change is mostly mechanical,
except that at each site the correct type had to be provided.

In some places we needed to do some extra work to get functions types,
including some new wrappers for C++ APIs that are not yet exposed by in
LLVM's C API, and some new "example" functions in llvmjit_types.c
because it's no longer possible to start from the function pointer type
and ask for the function type.

Back-patch to 12, because it's a little tricker in 11 and we agreed not
to put the latest LLVM support into the upcoming final release of 11.

[1] https://llvm.org/docs/OpaquePointers.html

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronan Dunklau <ronan.dunklau@aiven.io>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGKNX_%3Df%2B1C4r06WETKTq0G4Z_7q4L4Fxn5WWpMycDj9Fw%40mail.gmail.com
Commit 37d5bab used this C API function while adding support for LLVM
16 and opaque pointers, but it's not available in LLVM 7 and older.
Provide it in our own llvmjit_wrap.cpp.  It just calls a C++ function
that pre-dates LLVM 3.9, our minimum target.

Back-patch to 12, like 37d5bab.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGKnLnJnWrkr%3D4mSGhE5FuTK55FY15uULR7%3Dzzc%3DwX4Nqw%40mail.gmail.com
Changes required by https://llvm.org/docs/NewPassManager.html.

Back-patch to 12, leaving the final release of 11 unchanged, consistent
with earlier decision not to back-patch LLVM 16 support either.

Author: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKG%2BWXznXCyTgCADd%3DHWkP9Qksa6chd7L%3DGCnZo-MBgg9Lg%40mail.gmail.com
When processing a match tag, check to see if the claimed "off"
is more than the distance back to the output buffer start.
If it is, then the data is corrupt, and what's more we would
fetch from outside the buffer boundaries and potentially incur
a SIGSEGV.  (Although the odds of that seem relatively low, given
that "off" can't be more than 4K.)

Back-patch to v13; before that, this function wasn't really
trying to protect against bad data.

Report and fix by Flavien Guedez.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/01fc0593-e31e-463d-902c-dd43174acee2@oopacity.net
This doco said that use of => as an operator "is deprecated".
It's been fully disallowed since 865f14a back in 9.5, but
evidently that commit missed updating this statement.
Do so now.
This avoids a compiler bug occurring in AIX's xlc, even in pretty
late-model revisions.  Buildfarm testing has now confirmed that
only 64-bit xlc is affected.  Although we are contemplating
dropping support for xlc in v17, it's still supported in the
back branches, so we need this fix.

Back-patch of code changes from HEAD commit 19fa977.
(The test cases were already back-patched, in 4a427b8 et al.)

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+hUKGK=DOC+hE-62FKfZy=Ybt5uLkrg3zCZD-jFykM-iPn8yw@mail.gmail.com
When min_dynamic_shared_memory is set above 0, we try to find space in a
pre-allocated region of the main shared memory area instead of calling
dsm_impl_XXX() routines to allocate more.  The dsm_pin_segment() and
dsm_unpin_segment() routines had a bug: they called dsm_impl_XXX()
routines even for main region segments.  Nobody noticed before now
because those routines do nothing on Unix, but on Windows they'd fail
while attempting to duplicate an invalid Windows HANDLE.  Add the
missing gating.

Back-patch to 14, where commit 84b1c63 added this feature.  Fixes
pgsql-bugs bug #18165.

Reported-by: Maxime Boyer <maxime.boyer@cra-arc.gc.ca>
Tested-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18165-bf4f525cea6e51de%40postgresql.org
When scanning build farm results, it's useful to be able to see which
version is in use.  For the Meson build system, this information was
already displayed.

Back-patch to all supported branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4022690.1697852728%40sss.pgh.pa.us
Clearly spell out the limitations of aminsert()'s indexUnchanged hinting
mechanism in the index AM documentation.

Oversight in commit 9dc718b, which added the "logically unchanged
index" hint (which is used to trigger bottom-up index deletion).

Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reported-By: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-By: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzmU_BQ=-H9L+bxTSMQBqHMjp1DSwGypvL0gKs+dTOfkKg@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 14-, where indexUnchanged hinting was introduced.
Author: Ekaterina Kiryanova, Elena Indrupskaya, Oleg Sibiryakov, Maxim
Yablokov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7aad518b-3e6d-47f3-9184-b1d69cb412e7@postgrespro.ru
Backpatch-through: 11
As far as I can see, ecpg has no notion of a "default" open
connection.  You can do "CONNECT TO DEFAULT" but that just specifies
letting libpq use all its default connection parameters --- the
resulting connection is not special subsequently.  In particular,
SET CONNECTION = DEFAULT and DISCONNECT DEFAULT simply act on a
connection named DEFAULT, if you've made one; they do not have
special lookup rules.  But the documentation of these commands
makes it look like they do.

Simplest fix, I think, is just to remove the paras suggesting that
DEFAULT is special here.

Also, SET CONNECTION *does* have one special lookup rule, which
is that it recognizes CURRENT as an alias for the currently selected
connection.  SET CONNECTION = CURRENT is a no-op, so it's pretty
useless, but nonetheless it does something different from selecting
a connection by name; so we'd better document it.

Per report from Sylvain Frandaz.  Back-patch to all supported
versions.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/169824721149.1769274.1553568436817652238@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Debian recently decided to split out a bunch of "obsolete" timezone
names into a new tzdata-legacy package, which isn't installed by
default.  One of these zone names is Pacific/Enderbury, and that
breaks our regression tests (on --with-system-tzdata builds)
because our default timezone abbreviations list defines PHOT as
Pacific/Enderbury.

Pacific/Enderbury got renamed to Pacific/Kanton in tzdata 2021b,
so that in distros that still have this entry it's just a symlink
to Pacific/Kanton anyway.  So one answer would be to redefine PHOT
as Pacific/Kanton.  However, then things would fail if the
installed tzdata predates 2021b, which is recent enough that that
seems like a real problem.

Instead, let's just remove PHOT from the default list.  That seems
likely to affect nobody in the real world, because (a) it was an
abbreviation that the tzdb crew made up in the first place, with
no evidence of real-world usage, and (b) the total human population
of the Phoenix Islands is less than two dozen persons, per Wikipedia.
If anyone does use this zone abbreviation they can easily put it back
via a custom abbreviations file.

We'll keep PHOT in the Pacific.txt reference file, but change it
to Pacific/Kanton there, as that definition seems more likely to
be useful to future readers of that file.

Per report from Victor Wagner.  Back-patch to all supported
branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20231027152049.4b5c8044@wagner.wagner.home
When looping around after finding that the set-returning function
returned zero rows for the current input tuple, ExecProjectSet
neglected to reset either of the two memory contexts it's
responsible for cleaning out.  Typically this wouldn't cause much
problem, because once the SRF does return at least one row, the
contexts would get reset on the next call.  However, if the SRF
returns no rows for many input tuples in succession, quite a lot
of memory could be transiently consumed.

To fix, make sure we reset both contexts while looping around.

Per bug #18172 from Sergei Kornilov.  Back-patch to all supported
branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18172-9b8c5fc1d676ded3@postgresql.org
Formerly, the value computed by leftmostvalue_interval() was a long
way short of the minimum possible interval value.  As a result, an
index scan on a GIN index on an interval column with < or <= operators
would miss large negative interval values.

Fix by setting all fields of the leftmost interval to their minimum
values, ensuring that the result is less than any other possible
interval.  Since this only affects index searches, no index rebuild is
necessary.

Back-patch to all supported branches.

Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Heikki Linnakangas.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCV80%2BgOfF8ehNUUfaKBZgZMDfCfL-g1HhWGb6kC3rpDfw%40mail.gmail.com
pgstatindex failed with ERRCODE_DATA_CORRUPTED, of the "can't-happen"
class XX.  The other functions succeeded on an empty index; they might
have malfunctioned if the failed index build left torn I/O or other
complex state.  Report an ERROR in statistics functions pgstatindex,
pgstatginindex, pgstathashindex, and pgstattuple.  Report DEBUG1 and
skip all index I/O in maintenance functions brin_desummarize_range,
brin_summarize_new_values, brin_summarize_range, and
gin_clean_pending_list.  Back-patch to v11 (all supported versions).

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20231001195309.a3@google.com
4b82664 added a precheck to pgrowlocks() to ensure the given object's
pg_class.relam is HEAP_TABLE_AM_OID, however, that check was put before
another check which was checking if the given object was a partitioned
table.  Since the pg_class.relam is always InvalidOid for partitioned
tables, if pgrowlocks() was called passing a partitioned table, then the
"only heap AM is supported" error would be raised instead of the intended
error about the given object being a partitioned table.

Here we simply move the pg_class.relam check to after the check that
verifies that we are in fact working with a normal (non-partitioned)
table.

Reported-by: jian he
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACJufxFaSp_WguFCf0X98951zFVX+dXFnF1mxAb-G3g1HiHOow@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 12, where 4b82664 was introduced.
This also updates some C comments.

Reported-by: suchithjn22@gmail.com

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/167336599095.2667301.15497893107226841625@wrigleys.postgresql.org

Author: Laurenz Albe (doc patch)

Backpatch-through: 11
Also reorder entries and add commas.

Reported-by: David G. Johnston

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKFQuwYeNPxeocV3_0+Zx=_Xwvg+sNyEMdzyG5s2E2e0hZLQhg@mail.gmail.com

Author: David G. Johnston (partial)

Backpatch-through: 12
This part of the documentation refers to exceptions as handled by
PL/pgSQL, and using the internal error code is confusing.

Per thinko in 66bde49.

Reported-by: Euler Taveira, Bruce Momjian
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZUEUnLevXyW7DlCs@momjian.us
Backpatch-through: 11
Reported-by: Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/72652d72e1816bfc3c05d40f9e0e0373d07823c8.camel@octave.org

Co-authored-by: Laurenz Albe

Backpatch-through: 11
This text left one with the impression that an ON SELECT rule could
be attached to a plain table, which has not been true since commit
264c068 (meaning the text was already misleading when written,
evidently by me in 96bd67f).  However, it didn't get really bad
until b23cd18 removed the convert-a-table-to-a-view logic, which
had made it possible for scripts that thought they were attaching
ON SELECTs to tables to still work.

Rewrite into a form that makes it clear that an ON SELECT rule
is better regarded as an implementation detail of a view.
Pre-v16, point out that adding ON SELECT to a table actually
converts it to a view.

Per bug #18178 from Joshua Uyehara.  Back-patch to all supported
branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18178-05534d7064044d2d@postgresql.org
This was the backport of 2e3dc8c, but in older releases the newline
must be in the message.
Cherry-picked commit c7f84cf introduced a second copy of
check_for_removed_data_type_usage() while the first one already
exists in REL_2_STABLE. Remove the duplicate.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.