Fix NPE if on port 8096 getUserKeys

[resmo]

Description

We used to use port 8096 to access admin api keys in a cloudstack simulator testing setup for ansible. But this stopped working with an NPE since 4.22. I think. I am not sure if this is the correct fix but leaving it for testing and feedback. it's kind of an edge case.

This is what we do:

Install cs cloudstack cli client

$ pip install cs

configure dummy login, 8096 does not need a real secret/key but the cli want one

$ export CLOUDSTACK_ENDPOINT=http://127.0.0.1:8096
$ export CLOUDSTACK_SECRET=dummy
$ export CLOUDSTACK_KEY=dummy

query user id of admin account

$ admin_id="$(cs listUsers account=admin | jq '.user[0].id')"
$ echo $admin_id 
"3988a617-a622-11f1-a89d-ee147cfcbd84"

try to get api keys of admin user using its user id

$ cs getUserKeys id=$admin_id 
CloudStack error: HTTP 530 response from CloudStack
{
  "getuserkeysresponse": {
    "cserrorcode": 9999,
    "errorcode": 530,
    "errortext": "Cannot invoke \"org.apache.cloudstack.acl.apikeypair.ApiKeyPair.getUserId()\" because \"accessingKeyPair\" is null",
    "uuidList": []
  }
}

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
• Build/CI
• Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Bug Severity

• BLOCKER
• Critical
• Major
• Minor
• Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

Preparing for testing.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 11 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 19.79%. Comparing base (036493f) to head (9d7148e).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...c/main/java/com/cloud/user/AccountManagerImpl.java	0.00%	11 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #14104      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     19.79%   19.79%   -0.01%     
+ Complexity    20015    20014       -1     
============================================
  Files          6371     6371              
  Lines        575954   575960       +6     
  Branches      70521    70525       +4     
============================================
+ Hits         113997   113998       +1     
+ Misses       449530   449528       -2     
- Partials      12427    12434       +7     

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	3.52% <ø> (ø)
unittests	21.06% <0.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.