feat: recognize SparkCopyOnWriteScan as a native Iceberg scan - #5320
Open
unikdahal wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
feat: recognize SparkCopyOnWriteScan as a native Iceberg scan #5320unikdahal wants to merge 1 commit into
unikdahal wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #5319.
Rationale for this change
Iceberg's
MERGE/UPDATE/DELETEtarget tables scan throughSparkCopyOnWriteScan, whichextends the same
SparkPartitioningAwareScanbase as the already-supportedSparkBatchQueryScanbut wasn't in Comet's recognized scan set, so it always fell back to Spark.
What changes are included in this PR?
Add
SparkCopyOnWriteScantoIcebergReflection.ICEBERG_SCAN_CLASSES.How are these changes tested?
verified manually against a real Iceberg REST catalog.