docs(gaps): close GT-532 on its criteria, and carve out GT-651 - #394
Merged
Conversation
Correcting my own bookkeeping from the previous change: GT-532's two acceptance criteria were both satisfied and I left the boxes unticked. Portfolio views existed already (TowerMd3) and the per-tenant packages landed in evolith_tracker#115; nothing in the Core references the package types. So the row closes. It closes ON ITS CRITERIA, NOT ON ITS TITLE. The title also names marketplace-style adapters, which no criterion ever asked for and which did not ship. That is registered as GT-651 rather than left implicit inside a DONE row - an unstated intent inside a closed item is exactly the staleness this board keeps finding, and it is the mirror of the eight rows found this week that described work already done. GT-651 is deliberately UNSCOPED, and its acceptance criteria say so: what an adapter marketplace means for Evolith - a connector catalogue, a distribution channel for the governance packages GT-532 just made portable, or both - is a product decision. Writing criteria for a shape nobody has chosen would produce a row satisfiable without anybody wanting the result. The closure record cites only in-repository paths, as GT-605's does, because every implementing file lives in the Tracker; the rationale says so instead of listing paths that cannot resolve here.
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
📊 Bilingual Coverage ImpactPR Changes
Repository Coverage
✅ Good: All EN changes have ES counterparts. Generated by GitHub Actions |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Correcting my own bookkeeping from #393: GT-532's two acceptance criteria were both satisfied and I left the boxes unticked.
TowerMd3).evolith_tracker#115.So the row closes — on its criteria, not on its title.
The half that did not ship
The title also names marketplace-style adapters. No criterion ever asked for them, and they did not ship. Registered as GT-651 rather than left implicit inside a
DONErow.That distinction is the whole point: an unstated intent inside a closed item is exactly the staleness this board keeps finding, and it is the mirror of the eight rows found this week that described work already done. One direction wastes a week rebuilding something that exists; the other quietly drops something somebody wanted.
GT-651 is deliberately unscoped, and its acceptance criteria say so. What an adapter marketplace means for Evolith — a connector catalogue, a distribution channel for the governance packages GT-532 just made portable, or both — is a product decision. Writing criteria for a shape nobody has chosen would produce a row that can be satisfied without anybody wanting the result.
Bookkeeping
The closure record cites only in-repository paths, as GT-605's does, because every implementing file lives in the Tracker; the rationale says so instead of listing paths that cannot resolve here.
Board: 634 done / 649 total, five pending.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code