Skip to content

chore: sync develop_v4 with stage_v4 - #645

Merged
kirtesh-cstk merged 12 commits into
develop_v4from
develop_v4-sync-stag
Sep 10, 2026
Merged

kirtesh-cstk merged 12 commits into
develop_v4from
develop_v4-sync-stag

Conversation

@kirtesh-cstk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

develop_v4 is behind stage_v4 by the 4.5.0 release commits and the security bump that followed, so anything branched off develop_v4 today starts without them. This branch is develop_v4 with stage_v4 merged into it.

What comes in:

The merge was clean, no conflicts resolved by hand.

Replaces #644, which pointed stage_v4 straight at develop_v4 and could not be merged: develop_v4 requires the head branch to be up to date, and updating stage_v4 needs its own PR, so the two branches blocked each other. A branch that already carries both sides breaks that loop. Merging this first also unblocks #640, since develop_v4 will then contain stage_v4's tip.


🤖 Generated with Claude Code

karancs06 and others added 12 commits August 5, 2026 16:21
develop to stage 6 aug release
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
DOMPurify before 3.4.13 has an XSS bypass where IN_PLACE sanitization
combined with element-removal hooks can leave a detached DOM subtree
with executable event handlers (GHSA-55q2-fjhq-7xh7).

Bumps the dependency from ^3.4.12 to ^3.4.13, the first patched release.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Clears 9 advisories (8 high, 1 moderate) in postcss, vite, and ws.
Lockfile only; no package.json ranges changed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Spec fixtures used ad hoc api key strings that read like real stack keys
(bltanything, bltapikey, livePreviewApiKey123, test-key), so sample data was
hard to tell apart from meaningful values.

Replace them all with YOUR_API_KEY. The one exception is the test asserting
that a user-config api key takes precedence over an SDK header api key, where
the header keeps a distinct YOUR_HEADER_API_KEY so the assertion still proves
precedence rather than passing trivially.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
…hook-removal

fix(security): bump dompurify to patch XSS vulnerability
…lues-in-tests

chore(tests): standardize api key placeholder values in specs
@snyk-io

snyk-io Bot commented Sep 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status Scan Engine Critical High Medium Low Total (0)
Open Source Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues
Licenses 0 0 0 0 0 issues
Code Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔒 Security Scan Results

ℹ️ Note: Only vulnerabilities with available fixes (upgrades or patches) are counted toward thresholds.

Check Type Count (with fixes) Without fixes Threshold Result
🔴 Critical Severity 0 0 10 ✅ Passed
🟠 High Severity 0 0 25 ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium Severity 0 0 500 ✅ Passed
🔵 Low Severity 0 0 1000 ✅ Passed

⏱️ SLA Breach Summary

✅ No SLA breaches detected. All vulnerabilities are within acceptable time thresholds.

Severity Breaches (with fixes) Breaches (no fixes) SLA Threshold (with/no fixes) Status
🔴 Critical 0 0 15 / 30 days ✅ Passed
🟠 High 0 0 30 / 120 days ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium 0 0 90 / 365 days ✅ Passed
🔵 Low 0 0 180 / 365 days ✅ Passed

✅ BUILD PASSED - All security checks passed

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Coverage Report

Status Category Percentage Covered / Total
🔵 Lines 67.43% 2530 / 3752
🔵 Statements 66.28% 2570 / 3877
🔵 Functions 64.71% 453 / 700
🔵 Branches 61.98% 1531 / 2470
File CoverageNo changed files found.
Generated in workflow #901 for commit e1dee0f by the Vitest Coverage Report Action

@karancs06 karancs06 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!!

@kirtesh-cstk
kirtesh-cstk merged commit 3c658c8 into develop_v4 Sep 10, 2026
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants