Allow marking software as using AI in their development. - #637
Merged
Conversation
Member
|
Thanks, I think the icon can be less emphasised colour-wise: #bbb maybe |
Member
|
Keeping it in sw.ai is fine, but class name could be changed from |
Member
|
LGTM |
Celelibi
reviewed
Jul 30, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Given the recent debates over AI use I think its reasonable to propose marking software so people reading the software lists can make a fully informed choice.
I've marked ObsidianIRC as I know for sure that is AI assisted but if there is any software I have missed please notify me and I will mark them.
We should probably also have some kind of rule for what actually consists AI assisted. I'd personally lean towards marking anything substantially AI assisted to avoid potential witch hunts about whether minor patches are AI or not.
This piggybacks off the existing support for labelling OS support. I can change this if necessary but it felt like I would just be duplicating code to do anything else.