-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
Python: resolve postponed @response_handler annotations #8328
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
CoralGarden52
wants to merge
4
commits into
microsoft:main
Choose a base branch
from
CoralGarden52:fix/python-response-handler-postponed-annotations
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
43f4dc3
Python: resolve postponed response handler annotations
CoralGarden52 041339e
Modify handle_response to use WorkflowContext with bool
CoralGarden52 cf3e412
test: cover response handler annotation fallbacks
CoralGarden52 acc2bed
fix: harden response handler annotation validation
CoralGarden52 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we reject unresolved
TypeVars in both resolved request and response annotations before registering this handler? With postponed annotations,get_type_hints()turnsTinto~T, so a generic executor now instantiates successfully but_find_response_handler()passes~Ttoisinstance()and crashes on the first response dispatch. The existing@handlerand function-executor validators usecontains_typevar()to fail during decoration with a concrete-type diagnostic; applying the same check here would keep this path safe.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for catching this. Implemented in commit acc2bed: response-handler validation now applies contains_typevar() to both resolved request and response annotations before registration, preventing unresolved TypeVar objects from entering the handler registry and failing later during response dispatch. Regression tests now cover postponed TypeVars in both annotations.