BREAKING ISSUE
It appears that you folks used AI to complete a migration to Centralized Package Management and Package Pinning.
Instead of specifying the EFCore packages as an 11.- or something similar, they are pointed to a package version (11.0.0-rc.1.26431.118) that does not actually exist.
Each package should be pointing to its own version because it's entirely possible that the EFCore team will post an out-of-band release between cycles if they find a problem.
In the meantime, 11.0.0-rc.1.26425.128 is the correct version.
SOLUTION FOR DEVELOPERS IMPACTED
The solution for now is to directly reference transitive packages.
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore" Version="11.*-*" />
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Design" Version="11.*-*" />
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Relational" Version="11.*-*" />
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer" Version="11.*-*" />
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Tools" Version="11.*-*" />
HTH!
BREAKING ISSUE
It appears that you folks used AI to complete a migration to Centralized Package Management and Package Pinning.
Instead of specifying the EFCore packages as an 11.- or something similar, they are pointed to a package version (11.0.0-rc.1.26431.118) that does not actually exist.
Each package should be pointing to its own version because it's entirely possible that the EFCore team will post an out-of-band release between cycles if they find a problem.
In the meantime, 11.0.0-rc.1.26425.128 is the correct version.
SOLUTION FOR DEVELOPERS IMPACTED
The solution for now is to directly reference transitive packages.
HTH!