Skip to content

fix: handle missing and plaeholder usernames gracefully - #387

Draft
lwasser wants to merge 1 commit into
pyOpenSci:mainfrom
lwasser:fix-blank-usernames
Draft

fix: handle missing and plaeholder usernames gracefully#387
lwasser wants to merge 1 commit into
pyOpenSci:mainfrom
lwasser:fix-blank-usernames

Conversation

@lwasser

@lwasser lwasser commented Aug 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

closes #386

more soon...

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 89.65517% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 76.86%. Comparing base (ded9bd4) to head (7eb1936).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/pyosmeta/cli/update_review_teams.py 75.00% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
src/pyosmeta/models/base.py 92.30% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #387      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   79.31%   76.86%   -2.46%     
==========================================
  Files          13       14       +1     
  Lines         817      899      +82     
  Branches      106      119      +13     
==========================================
+ Hits          648      691      +43     
- Misses        155      192      +37     
- Partials       14       16       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

bug: when we have a blank reviewer field for a issue, the workflow tries to find that user

1 participant