Skip to content

docs(perf): Store / List Delivery Lane — the Octane board campaign and workflow - #3541

Merged
ryansolid merged 1 commit into
nextfrom
docs/store-list-perf-lane
Sep 18, 2026
Merged

ryansolid merged 1 commit into
nextfrom
docs/store-list-perf-lane

Conversation

@ryansolid

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Docs only. Hand-off for the store/list performance campaign (2026-08-16 → 2026-09-18) so it can continue in a fresh session without the chat history.

documentation/performance-experiments.md — new lane section:

documentation/benchmarking-strategy.md — "Octane board workflow": where, linking next, running, comparing, the gotchas (Playwright env, detached processes, 8-sample medians, timed-vs-structural ops, Octane drift, bundle split, signal-favoring), and the single-op profiling method.

No source changes; no changeset.

Made with Cursor

…026-08-16 → 09-18) and the board workflow

Hand-off for the store/list performance campaign, so it can continue in a
fresh session. performance-experiments.md gains the lane: goal and
rulings, instruments (Octane fork, local dbmon harness, results dirs),
the seven experiments in order with PR/branch, measurement and verdict
(patch channel + driver #3079/#3091/#3229, regions branch, unified For
slot #3281 / engine #3308, small-move #3227, coarse reads #3275,
create-floor diets #3270/#3367/#3368, props/spread/view work), the fixture
authoring rules and what the two passes covered, the uibench findings
(endpoint cloning 7.7x -> 2.5x; signal shape 0.46x the reconcile shape on
96/96 cases, ruled idiomatic), the todomvc add100 4x that was measurement
noise, the Sep 9 -> Sep 17 board with its caveats, standing lessons, and
the ordered open targets (disposal first). benchmarking-strategy.md gains
the Octane board workflow: fork/branch, linking next, running, comparing,
the gotchas each learned the hard way, and the single-op profiling
method.

Co-authored-by: Claude via Cursor <noreply@cursor.com>
@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Sep 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 2d4d43b

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@ryansolid
ryansolid merged commit 20e5a00 into next Sep 18, 2026
6 checks passed
@ryansolid
ryansolid deleted the docs/store-list-perf-lane branch September 18, 2026 17:31
@coveralls

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Coverage Report for CI Build 35374180919

Coverage remained the same at 71.366%

Details

  • Coverage remained the same as the base build.
  • Patch coverage: No coverable lines changed in this PR.
  • No coverage regressions found.

Uncovered Changes

No uncovered changes found.

Coverage Regressions

No coverage regressions found.


Coverage Stats

Coverage Status
Relevant Lines: 1035
Covered Lines: 783
Line Coverage: 75.65%
Relevant Branches: 802
Covered Branches: 528
Branch Coverage: 65.84%
Branches in Coverage %: Yes
Coverage Strength: 15.56 hits per line

💛 - Coveralls

@codspeed

codspeed Bot commented Sep 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 172 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 3 skipped benchmarks1


Comparing docs/store-list-perf-lane (2d4d43b) with next (ce17c29)2

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 3 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

  2. No successful run was found on next (5fe2686) during the generation of this report, so ce17c29 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants