Skip to content

fix(deps): update dependency scipy-stubs to >=1.18.1.0,<2 - #11

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/scipy-stubs-1.x
Open

fix(deps): update dependency scipy-stubs to >=1.18.1.0,<2#11
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/scipy-stubs-1.x

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Sep 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ℹ️ Note

This PR body was truncated due to platform limits.

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
scipy-stubs (changelog) >=1.11,<2>=1.18.1.0,<2 age confidence

Test plan: CI should pass with updated dependencies. No review required: this is an automated dependency update PR.


Release Notes

scipy/scipy-stubs (scipy-stubs)

v1.18.1.0

Compare Source

This scipy-stubs release comes with many improvements and even more fixes. It targets SciPy 1.18.1 and supports Python 3.12–3.15, NumPy 2.0–2.7, and optype 0.15–0.19.

🏆 Release Highlights

  • ✨ 105 improvements
  • 🐛 129 fixes
  • ✅ 100% test coverage
  • 🏷️ linalg.blas & linalg.lapack complete type coverage

What's Changed

⏬ SciPy Changes
✨ Improvements
🐛 Fixes
↪️ Compatibility
  • stats: rvs fallback overloads for compatibility with legacy type-checkers by @​jorenham in #​2005
  • sparse: *_array[Any].sum() workaround for mypy's and pyright's overload selection bugs by @​jorenham in #​2158
  • signal.[d]lti: add __init__ for compatibility with pyrefly and ty by @​jorenham in #​2205
📝 Documentation
✅ Testing
10 pull requests
🧹 Maintenance
43 pull requests

Important

✂ PR body was truncated to here.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: (in timezone America/Los_Angeles)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate Bot added the bot label Sep 10, 2026
@renovate

renovate Bot commented Sep 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

  • any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
  • the branch becomes conflicted, or
  • you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
  • you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: uv.lock
Command failed: uv lock --upgrade-package scipy-stubs
Using CPython 3.13.15 interpreter at: /opt/containerbase/tools/python/3.13.15/bin/python3
  × No solution found when resolving dependencies for split (markers:
  │ python_full_version == '3.11.*'):
  ╰─▶ Because the requested Python version (>=3.11, <3.14) does not satisfy
      Python>=3.12 and scipy-stubs==1.18.1.0 depends on Python>=3.12, we can
      conclude that scipy-stubs==1.18.1.0 cannot be used.
      And because only scipy-stubs<=1.18.1.0 is available, we can conclude
      that scipy-stubs>=1.18.1.0 cannot be used.
      And because codeprobe[dev] depends on scipy-stubs>=1.18.1.0 and your
      project requires codeprobe[dev], we can conclude that your project's
      requirements are unsatisfiable.

hint: While the active Python version is 3.13, the resolution failed for other Python versions supported by your project. Consider limiting your project's supported Python versions using `requires-python`.
hint: The `requires-python` value (>=3.11, <3.14) includes Python versions that are not supported by your dependencies (e.g., scipy-stubs==1.18.1.0 only supports >=3.12). Consider using a more restrictive `requires-python` value (like >=3.12).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants