Skip to content

Release: survive a single failed publish, and verify every package reached npm - #3967

Open
pranaygp wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
pgp/release-publish-resilience
Open

Release: survive a single failed publish, and verify every package reached npm#3967
pranaygp wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
pgp/release-publish-resilience

Conversation

@pranaygp

@pranaygp pranaygp commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Follow-up to #3963 and the 5.0.0-beta.48 publish (run 33809804842).

What happened

The beta.48 release shipped 7 of 21 packages on attempt 1 and 5 more on a manual rerun. As of now 4 are still not on npm: @workflow/nest, @workflow/nuxt, @workflow/sveltekit, @workflow/web (their beta tag still points at beta.47).

Two problems compounded:

  1. @changesets/cli 2.29.8 crashes on the error pnpm 11 produces. The workflow publishes with npm trusted publishing (no token, id-token: write). pnpm 11, which chore: upgrade to pnpm 11.24.0 #3901 moved us to on Sep 1, reimplements the OIDC exchange itself and, when it fails, only warns (Skipped OIDC: ...) and falls back to the .npmrc token, which is empty here, so npm answers E401. Changesets then evaluates json.error.detail.includes(...) on an error object with no detail and dies:
    TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'includes')
        at internalPublish (.../changesets-cli.cjs.js:786:90)
    
    That kills the process with other publishes mid-flight (attempt 2 then saw several of them as "Cannot publish over previously staged version"), and it swallows pnpm's stderr, which is the only place the real OIDC failure reason is printed. pnpm 10.20 delegated OIDC to npm's libnpmpublish, which is why the Aug 26 and Aug 31 releases published cleanly.
  2. Nothing compared the commit's manifests with the registry, so a half-published release looked like any other red Release job. The Aug 26 and Aug 31 jobs were also red, but only because the Slack step failed (token_expired, invalid_auth), which trained everyone to treat a red Release job as noise.

Changes

  • patches/@changesets__cli@2.29.8.patch (via pnpm patchedDependencies): a missing detail is treated as an ordinary failed publish for that one package, and the error line prints pnpm's message instead of undefined. The other packages keep publishing, and the log shows pnpm's Skipped OIDC: Failed token exchange request with body message: ... (status code ...) warning so the next occurrence tells us the root cause. Upstream fixed this class in 3.0.0 ([core] Extend OCC fence to all branch-decision writes #2132), but that is a major with an unrelated migration (.changeset/pre/ layout, pre.json removal), so a two-line patch is the right size for now. The lockfile diff is the three entries pnpm needs for the patch; running pnpm install instead re-threads a supports-color peer through ~2,300 lines, so the entries were added by hand and validated with pnpm install --frozen-lockfile ("Lockfile is up to date, resolution step is skipped").
  • scripts/check-published.mjs: for every non-private package changesets does not ignore, checks that the manifest version is in the registry's version list and that the branch's dist-tag (the pre-release tag from pre.json in pre mode, otherwise latest) points at it. Retries a few times for registry lag. release.yml runs it after the publish step with always(), so it reports even when the publish step crashes. The invariant holds on every commit of a release branch, so a gap keeps the job red until closed.
  • Slack step gets continue-on-error: true. The token still needs rotating (it has failed since Aug 26), but that should not mask the publish result.

Verified locally

Against the registry right now:

@workflow/nest               5.0.0-beta.48   NOT ON NPM
@workflow/nuxt               5.0.0-beta.48   NOT ON NPM
@workflow/sveltekit          5.0.0-beta.48   NOT ON NPM
@workflow/web                5.0.0-beta.48   NOT ON NPM
(22 others ok)

✗ 4 package version(s) on this commit are not on npm:

pnpm install --frozen-lockfile succeeds and the installed @changesets/cli dist contains the patched line.

Finishing beta.48 after this lands

  • nuxt never reached the registry: dispatch the Release workflow on main; changeset publish skips the 22 live versions and publishes it (and now logs why if OIDC fails again).
  • nest, sveltekit, web were reported as previously staged/published but are not visible: a maintainer needs to approve them in each package's Staged Packages tab on npmjs.com (2FA), or reject them and rerun.
  • Since the publish step never completed, no beta.48 git tags or GitHub release were created; pnpm changeset tag after everything is visible will create the tags.

No changeset: CI, scripts, and root tooling only.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

… actually reached npm

Publishing 5.0.0-beta.48 shipped 7 of 21 packages on the first attempt and
5 more on a rerun; 4 are still not on npm. Two things compounded:

- @changesets/cli 2.29.8 crashes on an E401 whose JSON has no `detail`
  field, which is the shape pnpm 11 produces when its OIDC token exchange
  fails and it falls back to the (empty) .npmrc token. The TypeError killed
  the process with other publishes mid-flight, and hid pnpm's own warning
  that says why OIDC was skipped. Patch the CLI (pnpm patchedDependencies)
  to treat a missing `detail` as a plain publish failure for that one
  package and to print pnpm's message, so the rest of the release proceeds
  and the log names the cause.
- Nothing compared the manifests on the commit with the registry, so a
  half-published release looked like any other red job. Add
  scripts/check-published.mjs and run it after the publish step regardless
  of that step's outcome.

Also stop a broken Slack token from failing an otherwise successful release;
that is what turned the Aug 26 and Aug 31 release jobs red.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@pranaygp
pranaygp requested a review from a team as a code owner September 3, 2026 23:58
Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings September 3, 2026 23:58
@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 7522597

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

All tests passed

⚠️ Flaky E2E Tests (passed on retry)

These tests failed at least once and passed on a retry. A recurring entry here is a real race worth investigating.

  • cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow (nextjs-turbopack)
  • promiseRaceWorkflow (tanstack-start)

🛠 Infra Events (absorbed by the harness)

Platform anomalies the e2e harness detected and worked around (e.g. a run the queue never picked up, replaced by a fresh run). Clustered timestamps indicate a backend blip; a steady drip indicates a platform issue worth escalating.

  • cold-start-warmup · suite warmup (tanstack-start) · at 19:23:28Z · abandoned wrun_01M1PXZNS0MJVAEEVTZSBDEGVA

E2E Test Summary

Summary
Passed Failed Skipped Total
✅ ▲ Vercel Production 3636 0 684 4320
✅ 💻 Local Development 2584 0 456 3040
✅ 📦 Local Production 2718 0 482 3200
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres 2718 0 482 3200
✅ 🪟 Windows 320 0 0 320
✅ 🌐 Cross-language Conformance 68 0 73 141
✅ vercel-http-transport 817 0 143 960
✅ vercel-multi-region 27 0 0 27
✅ vercel-ws-transport 553 0 87 640
Total 13441 0 2407 15848
Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-node 132 0 28
✅ astro-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ example-node 132 0 28
✅ example-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ express-node 132 0 28
✅ express-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ fastify-node 132 0 28
✅ fastify-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ hono-node 132 0 28
✅ hono-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ nest-node 132 0 28
✅ nest-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ nextjs-turbopack-node 157 0 3
✅ nextjs-turbopack-quickjs 157 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-node 157 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-quickjs 157 0 3
✅ nitro-node 132 0 28
✅ nitro-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ nuxt-node 132 0 28
✅ nuxt-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ python-node 66 0 94
✅ sveltekit-node 151 0 9
✅ sveltekit-quickjs 151 0 9
✅ tanstack-start-node 132 0 28
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ vite-node 132 0 28
✅ vite-quickjs 132 0 28

✅ 💻 Local Development

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ astro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nitro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ sveltekit-stable-node 153 0 7
✅ sveltekit-stable-quickjs 153 0 7
✅ tanstack-start-node 134 0 26
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-quickjs 134 0 26

✅ 📦 Local Production

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ astro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nitro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nitro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ sveltekit-stable-node 153 0 7
✅ sveltekit-stable-quickjs 153 0 7
✅ tanstack-start-node 134 0 26
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-quickjs 134 0 26

✅ 🐘 Local Postgres

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ astro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nitro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nitro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ sveltekit-stable-node 153 0 7
✅ sveltekit-stable-quickjs 153 0 7
✅ tanstack-start-node 134 0 26
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-quickjs 134 0 26

✅ 🪟 Windows

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-turbopack-quickjs 160 0 0

✅ 🌐 Cross-language Conformance

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ python 68 0 73

✅ vercel-http-transport

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ example 132 0 28
✅ express 132 0 28
✅ hono 132 0 28
✅ nextjs-turbopack 157 0 3
✅ nitro 132 0 28
✅ vite 132 0 28

✅ vercel-multi-region

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack 27 0 0

✅ vercel-ws-transport

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ example 132 0 28
✅ express 132 0 28
✅ nextjs-turbopack 157 0 3
✅ vite 132 0 28

📋 View full workflow run

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopack Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 4, 2026 7:24pm UTC
example-nextjs-workflow-webpack Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 4, 2026 7:24pm UTC
example-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 4, 2026 7:24pm UTC
workbench-astro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 4, 2026 7:24pm UTC
workbench-express-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 4, 2026 7:24pm UTC
workbench-fastify-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 4, 2026 7:24pm UTC
workbench-hono-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 4, 2026 7:24pm UTC
workbench-nestjs-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 4, 2026 7:24pm UTC
workbench-nitro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 4, 2026 7:24pm UTC
workbench-nuxt-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 4, 2026 7:24pm UTC
workbench-python-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 4, 2026 7:24pm UTC
workbench-sveltekit-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 4, 2026 7:24pm UTC
workbench-tanstack-start-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 4, 2026 7:24pm UTC
workbench-vite-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 4, 2026 7:24pm UTC
workflow-docs Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 4, 2026 7:24pm UTC
workflow-swc-playground Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 4, 2026 7:24pm UTC
workflow-tarballs Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 4, 2026 7:24pm UTC
workflow-web Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 4, 2026 7:24pm UTC

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Workflow Benchmarks

commit 7522597 · Fri, 04 Sep 2026 19:43:17 GMT · run logs

Backend: vercel · app: nextjs-turbopack

Metric Scenario Best (ms) P75 (ms) P90 (ms) P99 (ms) Samples
TTFS step 205 (-72%) 💚 1275 🔴 (+17%) 🔻 1393 🔴 (+25%) 🔻 1693 🔴 (+41%) 🔻 30
TTFS stream 197 (-10%) 1283 🔴 (+22%) 🔻 1296 🔴 (+18%) 🔻 1550 🔴 (+8.6%) 30
TTFS hook + stream 1427 (+63%) 🔻 1521 🔴 (+15%) 1528 🔴 (+8.8%) 1638 🔴 (+4.9%) 30
Fan-out TTFS Promise.all(100 steps) 604 (-30%) 💚 1968 (+15%) 🔻 2075 (+16%) 🔻 2489 (+33%) 🔻 10
Fan-out TTLS Promise.all(100 steps) 1918 (-16%) 💚 3949 (+8.8%) 5238 (+39%) 🔻 9056 (+25%) 🔻 10
STSO 1020 steps (inline) 103 (+3.0%) 144 (+11%) 166 (+7.8%) 250 (+23%) 🔻 1019
WO 1020 steps 139314 (+5.8%) 139314 (+5.8%) 139314 (+5.8%) 139314 (+5.8%) 1
CRTT first chunk (pooled) 72 (±0%) 104 (-27%) 💚 163 (-23%) 💚 638 (+80%) 🔻 28

Streams

Scenario CRTT 1st p75 p90 p99 CDV max iters
paced control (100/s, 60B) 89 (-10%) 162 (-16%) 684 (+126%) 1158 (+135%) 109 (-51%) 10
size sweep (100/s, 160B-12KB) 86 (-17%) 147 (-35%) 197 (-44%) 360 (-43%) 130 (-39%) 10
replay gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t (1x) 101 (-26%) 127 (-33%) 153 (-52%) 262 (-54%) 189 (-57%) 3
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (1x) 92.5 (-11%) 138 (-30%) 203 (-34%) 466 (-15%) 412 (-9%) 2
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (2x) 102 (-28%) 183 (-44%) 285 (-41%) 1782 (+90%) 376 (-20%) 3
📈 STSO distribution vs main (inline / queue-hop histograms)

1020 steps (inline)

Cumulative STSO time: main 131526ms → this run 139152ms (Δ +7626ms, +6%)

100-150 ms  █████████████████████┃██  main 899  this 812   -87
150-200 ms  ███░┃                     main 108  this 171   +63
200-250 ms  ┃                         main   8  this  25   +17
250-300 ms  ┃                         main   2  this   4    +2
300-350 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   3    +3
350-400 ms  ┃                         main   1  this   2    +1
400-450 ms  ┃                         main   1  this   1    +0
550-600 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   1    +1
📈 CRTT drill-down vs main (RTT distributions & profiles)
variant  RTT 1ms→5s+             avg         p50          p90           p99     n
control  ······▄█▂▁▁··   159.1 (+1%)  111 (-20%)  684 (+126%)  1158 (+135%)  3000
sweep    ······▄█▁····  121.7 (-31%)  113 (-27%)   197 (-44%)    360 (-43%)  3000
gw 1x    ·····▁▆█▁····  111.1 (-30%)  105 (-23%)   153 (-52%)    262 (-54%)  5295
eve 1x   ·····▁▇█▂▁···    121 (-26%)  103 (-24%)   203 (-34%)    466 (-15%)  5186
eve 2x   ·····▁▃█▃▁▁▁·  171.4 (-26%)  134 (-38%)   285 (-41%)   1782 (+90%)  7779

RTT over stream progress (avg per tenth of stream, bars scaled min→max):

control  █▆▄▄▅▃▃▁▁▁  109–244ms
sweep    █▄▂▃▃▄▂▂▂▁  108–157ms
gw 1x    █▇▂▇▂▁▃▃▃▁  101–127ms
eve 1x   ▄▇▇▃▂▁█▃▃▁  97–154ms
eve 2x   ▃▁▂▁▁▁▃▅▂█  118–341ms

RTT by chunk size (avg per log size bin, ~160B → ~12KB serialized, bars scaled min→max):

sweep  ▁▇██▇▅▄  119–123ms

Delivery jitter over stream progress (avg positive CDV per tenth of stream, bars scaled min→max):

control  ▅▁▄█▂▁▃▃▃▂  31–60ms
sweep    ▁▁▆██▆▅▄▆▄  41–55ms
gw 1x    ██▂▃▁▂▅▅▄▂  29–36ms
eve 1x   ▄█▅▃▃▁▄▁▂▃  20–30ms
eve 2x   █▃▃▁▃▂▅▁▂█  20–34ms
📜 Previous results (1)

f170303

Fri, 04 Sep 2026 00:17:26 GMT · run logs

vercel / nextjs-turbopack

Metric Scenario Best (ms) P75 (ms) P90 (ms) P99 (ms) Samples
TTFS step 253 (-77%) 💚 1223 🔴 (+3.7%) 1239 🔴 (+2.1%) 1358 🔴 (+4.9%) 30
TTFS stream 174 (-84%) 💚 1253 🔴 (+10%) 1267 🔴 (+9.3%) 1289 🔴 (+6.4%) 30
TTFS hook + stream 428 (-65%) 💚 1557 🔴 (+14%) 1604 🔴 (+15%) 🔻 1751 🔴 (+14%) 30
Fan-out TTFS Promise.all(100 steps) 480 (-25%) 💚 842 (-51%) 💚 863 (-50%) 💚 2137 (+18%) 🔻 10
Fan-out TTLS Promise.all(100 steps) 1765 (-14%) 2264 (-43%) 💚 2596 (-35%) 💚 9027 (+124%) 🔻 10
STSO 1020 steps (inline) 66 (-20%) 💚 129 (-7.2%) 147 (-6.4%) 235 (-7.1%) 1019
WO 1020 steps 130568 (-4.6%) 130568 (-4.6%) 130568 (-4.6%) 130568 (-4.6%) 1
CRTT first chunk (pooled) 56 (-5.1%) 83 (-36%) 💚 97 (-53%) 💚 419 (-38%) 💚 28

Streams

Scenario CRTT 1st p75 p90 p99 CDV max iters
paced control (100/s, 60B) 62 (-29%) 121 (-25%) 156 (-23%) 299 (-12%) 101 (-24%) 10
size sweep (100/s, 160B-12KB) 73.5 (-18%) 117 (-66%) 243 (-50%) 485 (-45%) 80.5 (-72%) 10
replay gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t (1x) 64 (-43%) 109 (-33%) 133 (-38%) 278 (-66%) 246 (-61%) 3
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (1x) 66.5 (-55%) 99 (-45%) 134 (-59%) 263 (-85%) 185 (-68%) 2
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (2x) 93 (-12%) 146 (-43%) 196 (-46%) 371 (-33%) 248 (-45%) 3
ℹ️ Metric definitions & methodology

Streams: first-chunk RTT (the stream-open path, before any buffering/backpressure), CRTT percentiles, and worst delivery stall (CDV max). Cells are medians across iterations; per-run values in the artifacts. No 🔴/🟢 marks until targets attach.

The collapsed STSO distribution section above buckets every step gap, split inline (same warm process — pure framework overhead) vs queue-hop (fresh process — dispatch, reinit, replay). = main, = this run, = fill.

The collapsed CRTT drill-down: per-variant RTT histograms (fixed log bins, · = empty) and mean RTT/positive-CDV profile lines over stream progress and chunk size. Histograms, avgs, and profiles merge exactly across runs; p50–p99 are percentile-of-percentiles. Per-index rows live in the artifacts.

Best/P75/P90/P99 deltas compare against the most recent benchmark run on main at the time of this run. 🔻 flags a delta worse than +15%, 💚 one better than −15%.

Metrics — TTFS: time to first step body (in-deployment start() → first step body) · Fan-out TTFS: fan-out time to first step (in-deployment start() → first of the parallel step bodies to complete) · Fan-out TTLS: fan-out time to last step (in-deployment start() → last of the parallel step bodies to complete, i.e. when the Promise.all resolves) · STSO: step-to-step overhead (gap between consecutive step bodies) · WO: workflow overhead (whole-run time outside step bodies, in-deployment anchored) · CRTT: chunk round-trip time (per-chunk write → read latency, one clock domain: deployment → stream backend → same deployment) · CDV: chunk delay variation / delivery jitter (inter-arrival gap minus inter-write gap per seq-adjacent pair; skew-free; the row is each run's MAX positive value, so one stall moves it)

Scenarios — step: one trivial no-op step, no stream; no hooks, so the run stays in turbo mode (in-process fast path) · stream: one streaming step; no hooks, so the run stays in turbo mode (in-process fast path) · hook + stream: registers a hook before one step, which exits turbo mode (dispatch path) · 1020 steps: 1020 trivial sequential steps; STSO is measured between consecutive steps in the given step ranges, and WO is the whole-run overhead outside step bodies · Promise.all(100 steps): 100 trivial no-op steps started together in a single Promise.all; Fan-out TTFS is the first of them to complete and Fan-out TTLS the last, both from the in-deployment clientStart, so their gap is the spread the runtime adds across the fan-out · paced control (100/s, 60B): the control: 300 tiny (~60B) deltas metronome-paced at 100/s — zero workload structure, so it reads the transport floor and flush cadence, and disambiguates transport-wide vs workload-specific when a replay row moves · size sweep (100/s, 160B-12KB): same pacing as the control with deltas padded in rotation across seven log-spaced sizes (~160B–12KB) — rotation decouples size from stream position, so it isolates whether chunk size causes latency · replay gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t (1x): raw provider SSE cadence captured at the AI gateway boundary (gpt-5.4-nano, the most popular gateway model; per-token deltas p50 208B = the modal production chunk size), replayed exactly as measured — the typical customer's workload; its CDV is the typical customer's real delivery jitter · replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (1x): a captured eve turn (gpt-5.6-sol, the most-used demanding eve model; ~2000 output tokens = production p50 turn length) replayed exactly as measured — eve's envelope protocol re-ships the cumulative message so sizes ramp 142B→13KB; the demanding outlier tenant's reality · replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (2x): the same eve capture at 2x — the headroom/stress row; real fast-tier models emit the same chunk sizes at proportionally higher rate, so time compression is a faithful speed model · first chunk (pooled): every run's seq-0 RTT pooled across all stream scenarios — the first chunk precedes any workload differentiation, so pooling samples one shared stream-open path with exact percentiles

Replay cadences (semantic sha256) — eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t eaf22f5946e7c61f3c65c7006d550df180cfabd4e706254a09f22aec0cfb420d · gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t 6f24ac518b6b83ff1d0e85a5fe78230db192716d66a7fc6b2fe022752001d041

🔴 marks a percentile over its target (within target is left unmarked). Targets (p75/p90/p99, ms) — TTFS 200/300/600

All timestamps are deployment-side; runs are triggered in-deployment, so the CI runner and api.vercel.com sit outside every measured window. TTFS = start() → first step body (includes dispatch + any cold start); Fan-out TTFS/TTLS = first/last step completion of one Promise.all from the same anchor (the gap is the runtime’s fan-out spread); STSO/WO between step bodies; CRTT inside the workflow (excludes the api.vercel.com read path).

Cold starts stay in the numbers (real bursty-workload latency, inflates P75+); Best is the warm floor.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔵 Needs a closer look

It changes core release/publishing behavior and should be validated by a maintainer with a real Release workflow run against npm before approval.

Pull request overview

Hardens the Release workflow so a single package publish failure doesn’t stop the rest of the publish loop, and so the workflow reliably reports whether the commit’s intended package versions actually reached npm (instead of failing “mysteriously” and leaving a half-shipped release unnoticed).

Changes:

  • Add scripts/check-published.mjs to cross-check each publishable package’s manifest version and expected dist-tag against the npm registry (with retries for registry lag).
  • Patch @changesets/cli@2.29.8 via pnpm patchedDependencies so missing json.error.detail no longer crashes Changesets during publish error handling.
  • Make the Slack notification non-blocking (continue-on-error: true) so notification failures don’t mask publish correctness.
File summaries
File Description
scripts/check-published.mjs New post-publish verification script comparing repo manifests vs npm registry versions/dist-tags.
pnpm-workspace.yaml Enables pnpm patchedDependencies for the Changesets CLI hotfix.
pnpm-lock.yaml Lockfile updates to record the applied patch hash for @changesets/cli@2.29.8.
patches/@changesets__cli@2.29.8.patch Patch preventing a publish-loop crash on missing error.detail and improving error logging fallback.
.github/workflows/release.yml Runs check-published after Changesets with always(), and makes Slack step non-blocking.
Review details

Files not reviewed (1)

  • pnpm-lock.yaml: Generated file
  • Files reviewed: 4/5 changed files
  • Comments generated: 0
  • Review effort level: Lite

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sim World

Simulated world deterministic testing for races. Traces

🟠 world-sim scenario book — 1 fail of 41 total

fence=per-spec

scenario outcome events virt replay violations
smoke-no-steps completed 3 0ms ok 0
smoke-one-step completed 6 0ms ok 0
hook-at-step-started completed 12 0ms ok 0
hook-at-step-completed completed 12 0ms ok 0
hook-at-hook-created completed 12 0ms ok 0
deadline-hook-wins completed 7 1.0h ok 0
deadline-expires completed 7 1.0h ok 0
long-sleep completed 11 30.0d ok 0
hook-never-arrives stalled 3 0ms skipped 0
step-retries-twice completed 10 2.0s ok 0
parallel-steps completed 9 0ms ok 0
hook-on-execution-state completed 12 0ms ok 0
peek-hook-before-branch completed 12 0ms ok 0
peek-hook-after-branch completed 12 0ms ok 0
peek-hook-at-registration completed 12 0ms ok 0
race-hook-before-probe completed 12 0ms ok 0
race-hook-after-probe completed 12 0ms ok 0
race-duplicate-delivery completed 13 0ms ok 0
attr-hook-before-step completed 11 0ms ok 0
attr-hook-after-step completed 11 0ms ok 0
attr-from-step-body completed 13 0ms ok 0
fork-hook-after-timeout completed 14 1.0m ok 0
fork-hook-before-timeout completed 14 1.0m ok 0
count-hook-after-timeout completed 17 1.0m ok 0
count-hook-before-timeout completed 20 1.0m ok 0
stale-read-step-count-fork completed 20 1.0m ok 0
stale-read-equal-step-counts completed 14 1.0m ok 0
step-vs-step-fork completed 12 0ms ok 0
step-vs-step-fork-fenced completed 12 0ms ok 0
fence-catches-benign-direction completed 12 5ms ok 0
in-flight-before-decision completed 17 1.0m ok 0
in-flight-before-decision-counted completed 17 1.0m ok 0
in-flight-after-decision completed 19 2.0m ok 0
stale-read-step-count-fork-fenced completed 20 1.0m ok 0
fork-hook-wins completed 13 1.0m ok 0
fork-timeout-wins completed 13 1.0m ok 0
unclaimed-payload-under-fork completed 17 1.0m ok 0
claimed-payload-under-fork completed 17 1.0m ok 0
writers-independent-step-bodies completed 12 0ms ok 0
writers-scripted-tempo completed 12 0ms ok 0
cancel-mid-step cancelled 7 0ms skipped 0

Full trace: world-sim.txt

const url = `${REGISTRY}/${name.replace('/', '%2F')}`;
const response = await fetch(url, {
headers: { accept: 'application/json', 'cache-control': 'no-cache' },
});

@vercel vercel Bot Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A transient npm registry error (5xx/429/network/malformed JSON) thrown from registryState() propagates through check() and rejects the top-level Promise.all, crashing the check script and marking a fully-successful Release job red.

Fix on Vercel

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
Framework Flow route Step reg. Framework output
hono 201.6 KiB (±0) 40.8 KiB (±0) 1.77 MiB (±0)
nextjs-turbopack 207.0 KiB (±0) 439 B (±0) 768.7 KiB (±0)
About these numbers

Sizes are gzip; parentheses show the change against main.
Flow route and Step reg. gate this job, on raw bytes rather than the gzip shown, at max(2%, 50.0 KiB). Framework output is informational.

7522597 · run

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants