Skip to content

Change Worker::process() return type to void - #334

Merged
vjik merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
worker-process-void
Sep 10, 2026
Merged

Change Worker::process() return type to void#334
vjik merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
worker-process-void

Conversation

@vjik

@vjik vjik commented Sep 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Q A
Is bugfix?
New feature?
Breaks BC? ✔️
Tests pass? ✔️

No caller used the returned message, and its meaning was inconsistent:
on the happy path it was the message after the consume middlewares, while
on a handled failure it was the message re-queued by the failure pipeline.
@vjik
vjik requested a review from a team September 9, 2026 09:21
@vjik vjik added the status:code review The pull request needs review. label Sep 9, 2026
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Sep 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 92.50%. Comparing base (63d7524) to head (0b337db).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #334      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     92.51%   92.50%   -0.01%     
  Complexity      383      383              
============================================
  Files            59       59              
  Lines          1015     1014       -1     
============================================
- Hits            939      938       -1     
  Misses           76       76              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@vjik
vjik merged commit 8937f11 into master Sep 10, 2026
28 of 29 checks passed
@vjik
vjik deleted the worker-process-void branch September 10, 2026 16:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

status:code review The pull request needs review.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants